Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population

Antecedentes: La Escala de Experiencias Positivas y Negativas de Diener (SPANE) evalúa la presencia e intensidad de afectos positivos y negativos, ya que estos se consideran aspectos básicos del estudio del bienestar. Este artículo estudia sus propiedades psicométricas en una muestra de población co...

Full description

Autores:: Martín Carbonell, Marta de la Caridad
Espejo Tort, Begoña
Checa, Irene
Fernández Daza, Martha Patricia
Paternina Avilés, Yadid Esther

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Repositorio:: Repositorio UCC

Idioma:

id	COOPER2_c61b95220ce92cd220e64914131d515d
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/34902
network_acronym_str	COOPER2
network_name_str	Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population
title	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population
spellingShingle	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population Afectividad positiva y negativa SPANE Bienestar Propiedades psicométricas Evaluación de la invarianza Análisis factorial confirmatorio Calidad de vida Positive and negative experiences SPANE Wellbeing Psycho-metric properties Measurement invariance Confirmatory factor analysis Colombian population Quality of life Psychological assessment Structural equation modeling
title_short	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population
title_full	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population
title_fullStr	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population
title_full_unstemmed	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population
title_sort	Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Martín Carbonell, Marta de la Caridad Espejo Tort, Begoña Checa, Irene Fernández Daza, Martha Patricia Paternina Avilés, Yadid Esther
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Martín Carbonell, Marta de la Caridad Espejo Tort, Begoña Checa, Irene Fernández Daza, Martha Patricia Paternina Avilés, Yadid Esther
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Afectividad positiva y negativa SPANE Bienestar Propiedades psicométricas Evaluación de la invarianza Análisis factorial confirmatorio Calidad de vida
topic	Afectividad positiva y negativa SPANE Bienestar Propiedades psicométricas Evaluación de la invarianza Análisis factorial confirmatorio Calidad de vida Positive and negative experiences SPANE Wellbeing Psycho-metric properties Measurement invariance Confirmatory factor analysis Colombian population Quality of life Psychological assessment Structural equation modeling
dc.subject.other.spa.fl_str_mv	Positive and negative experiences SPANE Wellbeing Psycho-metric properties Measurement invariance Confirmatory factor analysis Colombian population Quality of life Psychological assessment Structural equation modeling
description	Antecedentes: La Escala de Experiencias Positivas y Negativas de Diener (SPANE) evalúa la presencia e intensidad de afectos positivos y negativos, ya que estos se consideran aspectos básicos del estudio del bienestar. Este artículo estudia sus propiedades psicométricas en una muestra de población colombiana. Metodología: Realizamos un estudio transversal de 1255 colombianos y usamos modelos de ecuaciones estructurales para confirmar la estructura bifactorial. Además, estudiamos la invariancia por género y la validez convergente y concurrente. Resultados: Se encontraron indicadores de ajuste aceptables para el modelo bifactor (CFI = 0.889, RMSEA = 0.046, SRMR = 0.059) así como para los modelos de validez convergente (CFI = 0.909, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.063) y concurrente (CFI = 0.966 , RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.041) . No se confirmó la invariancia total entre los géneros, aunque sí invariancia métrica y de configuración, por lo que se proporcionaron percentiles por sexo. Conclusiones: El SPANE es una medida válida y confiable para evaluar el bienestar de la población colombiana, aunque alertamos a los investigadores sobre el riesgo de comparar puntajes promedio de afectividad entre sexos.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-01T20:04:47Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-01T20:04:47Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv	1660-4601
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126449
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/34902
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv	Martín-Carbonell, M.; Checa, I.; Fernández-Daza, M.; Paternina, Y.; Espejo, B. Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126449
identifier_str_mv	1660-4601 Martín-Carbonell, M.; Checa, I.; Fernández-Daza, M.; Paternina, Y.; Espejo, B. Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126449
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126449 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/34902
dc.relation.isversionof.spa.fl_str_mv	https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2664
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	erences 1. Moore, S.; Diener, E. Types of subjective well-being and their associations with relationship outcomes. J. Posit. Psychol. Wellbeing 2019, 3, 112–118 Huppert, F.; Marks, N.; Clark, A.E.; Siegrist, J.; Stutzer, A.; Vittersø, J.; Wahrendorf, M. Measuring Well-being Across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and Preliminary Findings. Soc. Indic. Res. 2008, 91, 301–315. [CrossRef] Daniel-González, L.; De La Rubia, J.M.; De La O, A.V.; García-Cadena, C.H. Structure analysis of subjective well-being. Salud Ment. 2020, 43, 119–127. [CrossRef] Giuntoli, L.; Vidotto, G. Exploring Diener’s Multidimensional Conceptualization of Well-Being Through Network Psychometrics. Psychol. Rep. 2021, 124, 896–919. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Jebb, A.T.; Morrison, M.; Tay, L.; Diener, E. Subjective Well-Being Around the World: Trends and Predictors Across the Life Span. Psychol. Sci. 2020, 31, 293–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Kushlev, K.; Drummond, D.M.; Diener, E. Subjective Well-Being and Health Behaviors in 2.5 Million Americans. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 2019, 12, 166–187. [CrossRef] Watson, D.; Clark, L.A.; Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 54, 1063–1070. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Diener, E.; Heintzelman, S.J.; Kushlev, K.; Tay, L.; Wirtz, D.; Lutes, L.D.; Oishi, S. Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Can. Psychol. Can. 2017, 58, 87–104. [CrossRef] Lucas, R.E.; Diener, E.; Suh, E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 71, 616–628. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Diener, E.; Seligman, M.E.P. Measure for Measure: The case for a national well-being index. Sci. Spirit 2006, 17, 36. [CrossRef] Diener, E.; Sandvik, E.; Pavot, W. Happiness Is the Frequency, Not the Intensity, of Positive versus Negative Affect. In Assessing Well-Being; Diener, E., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 213–231. ISBN 9048123534. Diener, E.; Wirtz, D.; Tov, W.; Kim-Prieto, C.; Choi, D.-W.; Oishi, S.; Biswas-Diener, R. New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Soc. Indic. Res. 2010, 97, 143–156. [CrossRef] Rice, S.P.M.; Shorey-Fennell, B.R. Comparing the Psychometric Properties of Common Measures of Positive and Negative Emotional Experiences: Implications for the Assessment of Subjective Wellbeing. J. Well Being Assess. 2020, 4, 37–56. [CrossRef] Rahm, T.; Heise, E.; Schuldt, M. Measuring the frequency of emotions—validation of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in Germany. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171288. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Howell, A.J.; Buro, K. Measuring and Predicting Student Well-Being: Further Evidence in Support of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 121, 903–915. [CrossRef] Singh, K.; Junnarkar, M.; Jaswal, S. Validating the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in India. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2016, 19, 943–954. [CrossRef] Sumi, K. Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. Soc. Indic. Res. 2013, 118, 601–615. [CrossRef] Silva, A.J.; Caetano, A. Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in Portugal. Soc. Indic. Res. 2013, 110, 469–478. [CrossRef] Telef, B.B. The positive and negative experience scale adaptation for Turkish university students. Eur. Sci. J. 2015, 11, 49 Rasskazova, E.I.; Lebedeva, A.A. Screening scale of positive and negative experience (SPANE): Validation of the russian version. Psychol. J. High. Sch. Econ. 2020, 17, 250–263. [CrossRef] Jovanovi´c, V. Beyond the PANAS: Incremental validity of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in relation to well-being. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2015, 86, 487–491. [CrossRef] Jovanovi´c, V.; Lazi´c, M.; Gavrilov-Jerkovi´c, V.; Molenaar, D. The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE): Evaluation of measurement invariance and convergent and discriminant validity. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 2020, 36, 694–704. [CrossRef] Kyriazos, T.A.; Stalikas, A.; Prassa, K.; Yotsidi, V. A 3-Faced Construct Validation and a Bifactor Subjective Well-Being Model Using the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience, Greek Version. Psychology 2018, 9, 1143–1175. [CrossRef] Corno, G.; Molinari, G.; Baños, R.M. Assessing positive and negative experiences: Validation of a new measure of well-being in an Italian population. Riv. Psichiatr. 2016, 51, 110–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Li, F.; Bai, X.; Wang, Y. The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE): Psychometric Properties and Normative Data in a Large Chinese Sample. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61137. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Cassaretto, M.; Martínez Uribe, P. Validación de las escalas de bienestar, de florecimiento y afectividad. Pensam. Psicol. 2017, 15, 19–31. [CrossRef] Daniel-González, L.; de la Rubia, J.M.; Valle de la O, A.; García-Cadena, C.H.; Martínez-Martí, M.L. Validation of the Mexican Spanish Version of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in a Sample of Medical and Psychology Students. Psychol. Rep. 2020, 123, 2053–2079. [CrossRef] Carmona-Halty, M.; Villegas-Robertson, J.M. Escala de Experiencias Positivas y Negativas (SPANE): Adaptación y validación en un contexto escolar chileno. Interciencia 2018, 43, 317–319. Espejo, B.; Checa, I.; Perales-Puchalt, J.; Lisón, J.F. Validation and Measurement Invariance of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in a Spanish General Sample. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8359. [CrossRef] Giuntoli, L.; Ceccarini, F.; Sica, C.; Caudek, C. Validation of the Italian Versions of the Flourishing Scale and of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. SAGE Open 2017, 7, 215824401668229. [CrossRef] Muñiz, J.; Elosúa, P.; Padilla, J.-L.; Hambleton, R.K. Test adaptation standards for cross-lingual assessment. In Educational Measurement from Foundations to Future; Wells, C.S., Faulkner-Bond, M., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 291–304. Hernández, A.; Hidalgo, M.D.; Hambleton, R.K.; Gómez-Benito, J. International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema 2020, 32, 390–398. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Cantor-Parra, L.S.; Clavijo-Benavidez, M.P. Adaptación y validación de la escala de afectividad positiva y negativa (PANAS) al contexto colombiano, en una muestra de madres solteras en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia; Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Sede Bogotá: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020 Martín-Carbonell, M.; Espejo, B.; Checa, I.; Fernández-Daza, M. Adaptation and Measurement Invariance by Gender of the Flourishing Scale in a Colombian Sample. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2664. [CrossRef] Diener, E.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J. Pers. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [CrossRef] Ruiz, F.J.; Suárez-Falcón, J.C.; Flórez, C.L.; Odriozola-González, P.; Tovar, D.; López-González, S.; Baeza-Martín, R. Validity of the satisfaction with life scale in Colombia and factorial equivalence with spanish data. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2019, 51, 58–65. [CrossRef] Scheier, M.F.; Carver, C.S.; Bridges, M.W. Distinguishing Optimism From Neuroticism (and Trait Anxiety, Self-Mastery, and Self-Esteem): A Reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 67, 1063–1078. [CrossRef] Velasco, M.; Constanza, S.; Pérez, L.; Castañeda, I.A. Validation of questionnaire dispositional optimism using item response theory. Divers. Perspect. Psicol. 2014, 10, 275–292. Marsh, H.W.; Hau, K.-T.; Wen, Z. In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 2004, 11, 320–341. [CrossRef] Ventura-León, J.; Peña-Calero, B.N. El mundo no debería girar alrededor del alfa de Cronbach ≥ 0.70. Adicciones 2020, 1576. [CrossRef] Kline, R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2016 Werts, C.; Linn, R.; Jöreskog, K. Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1974, 34, 25–33. [CrossRef] McDonald, R. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2013. Raykov, T. Estimation of Composite Reliability for Congeneric Measures. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1997, 21, 173–184. [CrossRef] Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J.Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39. [CrossRef] Raykov, T.; Marcoulides, G.A. Introduction to Psychometric Theory; Routledge Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 0415878225 Jöreskog, K.G. On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika 1994, 59, 381–389. [CrossRef] Muthén, B. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 1984, 49, 115–132. [CrossRef] Lai, M.H.C.; Yoon, M. A Modified Comparative Fit Index for Factorial Invariance Studies. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2014, 22, 236–248. [CrossRef] Cheung, G.W.; Rensvold, R.B. Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2002, 9, 233–255. [CrossRef] Muthén, L.K.; Muthén, B. Mplus User’s Guide, 8th ed.; Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017 Rhemtulla, M.; Brosseau-Liard, P.É.; Savalei, V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol. Methods 2012, 17, 354–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Johnson, D.R.; Creech, J.C. Ordinal Measures in Multiple Indicator Models: A Simulation Study of Categorization Error. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48, 398. [CrossRef] Raykov, T. Scale construction and development using structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 472–492. Rigdon, E.E. Structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research; Marcoulides, G.A., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1998; pp. 251–294. Li, C.-H. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav. Res. Methods 2015, 48, 936–949. [CrossRef] International Business Machines Corporation. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0); [Computer Software]; IBM Corp Armonk: New York, NY, USA, 2013. Scherer, K.R.; Shuman, V.; Fontaine, J.R.J.; Soriano, C. The GRID meets the Wheel: Assessing emotional feeling via self-report1. In Components of Emotional Meaning; Oxford University Press (OUP): Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 281–298 Yik, M.; Russell, J.A.; Steiger, J.H. A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion 2011, 11, 705–731. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Lai, K.; Green, S.B. The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2016, 51, 220–239. [CrossRef] Shi, D.; Maydeu-Olivares, A.; Rosseel, Y. Assessing Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2019, 27, 1–15. [CrossRef] Kaiser, H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39, 31–36. [CrossRef] Batista-Foguet, J.M.; Coenders, G.; Alonso, J. Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med. Clín. 2004, 122, 21–27. [CrossRef] Hu, L.-T.; Bentler, P.M. Evaluating model fit. In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1995; Chapter xxii; p. 99. Hebra, L.T.; Marta Martin Carbonell, C.; Díaz, R.P.; Antonio Riquelme Marín, C. Positive and Negative Affectivity on Elders with or within mix or anxiety depressive symptoms \| Afectividad positiva y negativa en ancianos con y sin sintomatología depresiva, ansiosa o mixta. Rev. Hosp. Psiquiatr. Habana 2013, 10, 2. Blázquez, F.P.; Soria-Mas, C.; Contreras, G.N. Afecto positivo y negativo: ¿Una dimensión bipolar o dos dimensiones unipolares independientes? Interdiscip. Rev. Psicol. Cienc. Afines 2012, 29, 151–164. [CrossRef] Osorio, H.D.L.; González, I.C.V.; Trujillo, L.E.T. Afectividad y Apoyo Social Percibido en Mujeres Gestantes: Un Análisis Comparativo. Rev. Colomb. Psicol. 2018, 27, 85–101. [CrossRef] Tobar, R.A.T.; Aguirre, K.V.B.; Gómez, L.J.G.; Mancipe, Á.P.S.; Parra, K.R.; Ortiz, L.M.G. Variables transdiagnósticas predictoras de los problemas emocionales y afectivos en una muestra colombiana. Duazary 2018, 15, 143–155. [CrossRef] Van Dierendonck, D.; Díaz, D.; Rodríguez-Carvajal, R.; Blanco, A.; Moreno-Jiménez, B. Ryff’s Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being, A Spanish Exploration. Soc. Indic. Res. 2008, 87, 473–479. [CrossRef] Arthaud-Day, M.L.; Rode, J.C.; Mooney, C.H.; Near, J.P. The Subjective Well-being Construct: A Test of its Convergent, Discriminant, and Factorial Validity. Soc. Indic. Res. 2005, 74, 445–476. [CrossRef] Henderson, L.W.; Knight, T. Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. Int. J. Wellbeing 2012, 2, 196–221. [CrossRef] Zuckerman, M.; Li, C.; Diener, E.F. Societal Conditions and the Gender Difference in Well-Being. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2017, 43, 329–336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Mathews, G. Happiness, culture, and context. Int. J. Wellbeing 2012, 2, 299–312. [CrossRef] Batz, C.; Tay, L. Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being Past Research on Gender Differences in Subjective Well-being. In Handbook of Well-Being; DEF Publishers: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018. Narcotelenovelas: La Construcción de Nuevos Estereotipos de Mujer en la Ficción Televisiva de Colombia y México a Través del Retrato de una Realidad Social/—Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB. Available online: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/189628 (accessed on 9 November 2020). Tomáš Došek, B.; José Uribe Mendoza, C. Más allá de las reformas inclusivas. Los obstáculos (formales e informales) a la igualdad de género en América Latina Beyond Inclusive Reforms: (Formal and informal) Obstacles to Gender Equality in Latin America. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Políticas Soc. 2020, 65, 535–539. [CrossRef] Paladino, C.; Gorostiaga, D. Expresividad Emocional y Estereotipos de Género; Manuscrito Inédito. Departamento de Ciencia de la Comunicación, Universidad Nacional de la Plata: La Plata, Argentina, 2004. Available online: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/ 10915/3242 (accessed on 5 December 2020).
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv	Atribución
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	12
dc.coverage.temporal.spa.fl_str_mv	18 (12)
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Seccional Santa Marta
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Psicología
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv	Santa Marta
institution	Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/954af788-3e4c-4f1d-a42d-c30f19a8d09b/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/416e18ff-ccc8-44cf-ab1a-c04c214d459f/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/a194d37a-a401-4b32-9434-00be7f2f96e3/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/98e24029-4b37-4ffd-b03e-66bff4559736/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	f5164849398490ec1a7280ec57be8ea9 3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45 7fe4b839e21d80c77e48749d7f872d4c b850cc47767b7d62776c31443c920b41
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814247117145767936
spelling	Martín Carbonell, Marta de la CaridadEspejo Tort, BegoñaCheca, IreneFernández Daza, Martha PatriciaPaternina Avilés, Yadid Esther 18 (12)2021-07-01T20:04:47Z2021-07-01T20:04:47Z2021-051660-4601https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126449https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/34902Martín-Carbonell, M.; Checa, I.; Fernández-Daza, M.; Paternina, Y.; Espejo, B. Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126449Antecedentes: La Escala de Experiencias Positivas y Negativas de Diener (SPANE) evalúa la presencia e intensidad de afectos positivos y negativos, ya que estos se consideran aspectos básicos del estudio del bienestar. Este artículo estudia sus propiedades psicométricas en una muestra de población colombiana. Metodología: Realizamos un estudio transversal de 1255 colombianos y usamos modelos de ecuaciones estructurales para confirmar la estructura bifactorial. Además, estudiamos la invariancia por género y la validez convergente y concurrente. Resultados: Se encontraron indicadores de ajuste aceptables para el modelo bifactor (CFI = 0.889, RMSEA = 0.046, SRMR = 0.059) así como para los modelos de validez convergente (CFI = 0.909, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.063) y concurrente (CFI = 0.966 , RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.041) . No se confirmó la invariancia total entre los géneros, aunque sí invariancia métrica y de configuración, por lo que se proporcionaron percentiles por sexo. Conclusiones: El SPANE es una medida válida y confiable para evaluar el bienestar de la población colombiana, aunque alertamos a los investigadores sobre el riesgo de comparar puntajes promedio de afectividad entre sexos.(1) Background: Diener’s Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences (SPANE) assesses the presence and intensity of positive and negative affects, since these are considered basic aspects of the study of well-being. This article studies its psychometric properties in the general Colombian population. (2) We conducted a cross-sectional study of a sample of 1255 Colombians and we used structural equation modeling to confirm the bifactor structure. Additionally, we studied invariance by gender, and convergent and concurrent validity. (3) We found acceptable fit indicators for the bifactor model (CFI = 0.889, RMSEA = 0.046, SRMR = 0.059) as well as for the convergent (CFI = 0.909, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.063) and concurrent (CFI = 0.966, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.041) validity models. We did not confirm total invariance across gender, although we found configural and metric invariance, so percentiles by sex were provided. (4) Conclusions: The SPANE is a valid and reliable measure to assess well-being among the Colombian population, although we alert researchers to the risk of comparing affectivity average scores between sexeshttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001561776https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6337-577Xhttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/Medicion/graficas/verPerfiles.jsp?id_convocatoria=19&nroIdGrupo=00000000007548martha.martinc@campusucc.edu.cohttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=dzSlO-cAAAAJ&hl=es12Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Seccional Santa MartaPsicologíaSanta Martahttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2664International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healtherences 1. Moore, S.; Diener, E. Types of subjective well-being and their associations with relationship outcomes. J. Posit. Psychol. Wellbeing 2019, 3, 112–118Huppert, F.; Marks, N.; Clark, A.E.; Siegrist, J.; Stutzer, A.; Vittersø, J.; Wahrendorf, M. Measuring Well-being Across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and Preliminary Findings. Soc. Indic. Res. 2008, 91, 301–315. [CrossRef]Daniel-González, L.; De La Rubia, J.M.; De La O, A.V.; García-Cadena, C.H. Structure analysis of subjective well-being. Salud Ment. 2020, 43, 119–127. [CrossRef]Giuntoli, L.; Vidotto, G. Exploring Diener’s Multidimensional Conceptualization of Well-Being Through Network Psychometrics. Psychol. Rep. 2021, 124, 896–919. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Jebb, A.T.; Morrison, M.; Tay, L.; Diener, E. Subjective Well-Being Around the World: Trends and Predictors Across the Life Span. Psychol. Sci. 2020, 31, 293–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Kushlev, K.; Drummond, D.M.; Diener, E. Subjective Well-Being and Health Behaviors in 2.5 Million Americans. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 2019, 12, 166–187. [CrossRef]Watson, D.; Clark, L.A.; Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 54, 1063–1070. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Diener, E.; Heintzelman, S.J.; Kushlev, K.; Tay, L.; Wirtz, D.; Lutes, L.D.; Oishi, S. Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Can. Psychol. Can. 2017, 58, 87–104. [CrossRef]Lucas, R.E.; Diener, E.; Suh, E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 71, 616–628. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Diener, E.; Seligman, M.E.P. Measure for Measure: The case for a national well-being index. Sci. Spirit 2006, 17, 36. [CrossRef]Diener, E.; Sandvik, E.; Pavot, W. Happiness Is the Frequency, Not the Intensity, of Positive versus Negative Affect. In Assessing Well-Being; Diener, E., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 213–231. ISBN 9048123534.Diener, E.; Wirtz, D.; Tov, W.; Kim-Prieto, C.; Choi, D.-W.; Oishi, S.; Biswas-Diener, R. New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Soc. Indic. Res. 2010, 97, 143–156. [CrossRef]Rice, S.P.M.; Shorey-Fennell, B.R. Comparing the Psychometric Properties of Common Measures of Positive and Negative Emotional Experiences: Implications for the Assessment of Subjective Wellbeing. J. Well Being Assess. 2020, 4, 37–56. [CrossRef]Rahm, T.; Heise, E.; Schuldt, M. Measuring the frequency of emotions—validation of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in Germany. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Howell, A.J.; Buro, K. Measuring and Predicting Student Well-Being: Further Evidence in Support of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 121, 903–915. [CrossRef]Singh, K.; Junnarkar, M.; Jaswal, S. Validating the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in India. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2016, 19, 943–954. [CrossRef]Sumi, K. Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. Soc. Indic. Res. 2013, 118, 601–615. [CrossRef]Silva, A.J.; Caetano, A. Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in Portugal. Soc. Indic. Res. 2013, 110, 469–478. [CrossRef]Telef, B.B. The positive and negative experience scale adaptation for Turkish university students. Eur. Sci. J. 2015, 11, 49Rasskazova, E.I.; Lebedeva, A.A. Screening scale of positive and negative experience (SPANE): Validation of the russian version. Psychol. J. High. Sch. Econ. 2020, 17, 250–263. [CrossRef]Jovanovi´c, V. Beyond the PANAS: Incremental validity of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in relation to well-being. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2015, 86, 487–491. [CrossRef]Jovanovi´c, V.; Lazi´c, M.; Gavrilov-Jerkovi´c, V.; Molenaar, D. The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE): Evaluation of measurement invariance and convergent and discriminant validity. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 2020, 36, 694–704. [CrossRef]Kyriazos, T.A.; Stalikas, A.; Prassa, K.; Yotsidi, V. A 3-Faced Construct Validation and a Bifactor Subjective Well-Being Model Using the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience, Greek Version. Psychology 2018, 9, 1143–1175. [CrossRef]Corno, G.; Molinari, G.; Baños, R.M. Assessing positive and negative experiences: Validation of a new measure of well-being in an Italian population. Riv. Psichiatr. 2016, 51, 110–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Li, F.; Bai, X.; Wang, Y. The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE): Psychometric Properties and Normative Data in a Large Chinese Sample. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Cassaretto, M.; Martínez Uribe, P. Validación de las escalas de bienestar, de florecimiento y afectividad. Pensam. Psicol. 2017, 15, 19–31. [CrossRef]Daniel-González, L.; de la Rubia, J.M.; Valle de la O, A.; García-Cadena, C.H.; Martínez-Martí, M.L. Validation of the Mexican Spanish Version of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in a Sample of Medical and Psychology Students. Psychol. Rep. 2020, 123, 2053–2079. [CrossRef]Carmona-Halty, M.; Villegas-Robertson, J.M. Escala de Experiencias Positivas y Negativas (SPANE): Adaptación y validación en un contexto escolar chileno. Interciencia 2018, 43, 317–319.Espejo, B.; Checa, I.; Perales-Puchalt, J.; Lisón, J.F. Validation and Measurement Invariance of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in a Spanish General Sample. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8359. [CrossRef]Giuntoli, L.; Ceccarini, F.; Sica, C.; Caudek, C. Validation of the Italian Versions of the Flourishing Scale and of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. SAGE Open 2017, 7, 215824401668229. [CrossRef]Muñiz, J.; Elosúa, P.; Padilla, J.-L.; Hambleton, R.K. Test adaptation standards for cross-lingual assessment. In Educational Measurement from Foundations to Future; Wells, C.S., Faulkner-Bond, M., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 291–304.Hernández, A.; Hidalgo, M.D.; Hambleton, R.K.; Gómez-Benito, J. International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema 2020, 32, 390–398. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Cantor-Parra, L.S.; Clavijo-Benavidez, M.P. Adaptación y validación de la escala de afectividad positiva y negativa (PANAS) al contexto colombiano, en una muestra de madres solteras en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia; Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Sede Bogotá: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020Martín-Carbonell, M.; Espejo, B.; Checa, I.; Fernández-Daza, M. Adaptation and Measurement Invariance by Gender of the Flourishing Scale in a Colombian Sample. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2664. [CrossRef]Diener, E.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J. Pers. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [CrossRef]Ruiz, F.J.; Suárez-Falcón, J.C.; Flórez, C.L.; Odriozola-González, P.; Tovar, D.; López-González, S.; Baeza-Martín, R. Validity of the satisfaction with life scale in Colombia and factorial equivalence with spanish data. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2019, 51, 58–65. [CrossRef]Scheier, M.F.; Carver, C.S.; Bridges, M.W. Distinguishing Optimism From Neuroticism (and Trait Anxiety, Self-Mastery, and Self-Esteem): A Reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 67, 1063–1078. [CrossRef]Velasco, M.; Constanza, S.; Pérez, L.; Castañeda, I.A. Validation of questionnaire dispositional optimism using item response theory. Divers. Perspect. Psicol. 2014, 10, 275–292.Marsh, H.W.; Hau, K.-T.; Wen, Z. In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 2004, 11, 320–341. [CrossRef]Ventura-León, J.; Peña-Calero, B.N. El mundo no debería girar alrededor del alfa de Cronbach ≥ 0.70. Adicciones 2020, 1576. [CrossRef]Kline, R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2016Werts, C.; Linn, R.; Jöreskog, K. Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1974, 34, 25–33. [CrossRef]McDonald, R. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2013.Raykov, T. Estimation of Composite Reliability for Congeneric Measures. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1997, 21, 173–184. [CrossRef]Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J.Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39. [CrossRef]Raykov, T.; Marcoulides, G.A. Introduction to Psychometric Theory; Routledge Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 0415878225Jöreskog, K.G. On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika 1994, 59, 381–389. [CrossRef]Muthén, B. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 1984, 49, 115–132. [CrossRef]Lai, M.H.C.; Yoon, M. A Modified Comparative Fit Index for Factorial Invariance Studies. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2014, 22, 236–248. [CrossRef]Cheung, G.W.; Rensvold, R.B. Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2002, 9, 233–255. [CrossRef]Muthén, L.K.; Muthén, B. Mplus User’s Guide, 8th ed.; Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017Rhemtulla, M.; Brosseau-Liard, P.É.; Savalei, V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol. Methods 2012, 17, 354–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Johnson, D.R.; Creech, J.C. Ordinal Measures in Multiple Indicator Models: A Simulation Study of Categorization Error. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48, 398. [CrossRef]Raykov, T. Scale construction and development using structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 472–492.Rigdon, E.E. Structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research; Marcoulides, G.A., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1998; pp. 251–294.Li, C.-H. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav. Res. Methods 2015, 48, 936–949. [CrossRef]International Business Machines Corporation. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0); [Computer Software]; IBM Corp Armonk: New York, NY, USA, 2013.Scherer, K.R.; Shuman, V.; Fontaine, J.R.J.; Soriano, C. The GRID meets the Wheel: Assessing emotional feeling via self-report1. In Components of Emotional Meaning; Oxford University Press (OUP): Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 281–298Yik, M.; Russell, J.A.; Steiger, J.H. A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion 2011, 11, 705–731. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Lai, K.; Green, S.B. The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2016, 51, 220–239. [CrossRef]Shi, D.; Maydeu-Olivares, A.; Rosseel, Y. Assessing Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2019, 27, 1–15. [CrossRef]Kaiser, H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39, 31–36. [CrossRef]Batista-Foguet, J.M.; Coenders, G.; Alonso, J. Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med. Clín. 2004, 122, 21–27. [CrossRef]Hu, L.-T.; Bentler, P.M. Evaluating model fit. In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1995; Chapter xxii; p. 99.Hebra, L.T.; Marta Martin Carbonell, C.; Díaz, R.P.; Antonio Riquelme Marín, C. Positive and Negative Affectivity on Elders with or within mix or anxiety depressive symptoms \| Afectividad positiva y negativa en ancianos con y sin sintomatología depresiva, ansiosa o mixta. Rev. Hosp. Psiquiatr. Habana 2013, 10, 2.Blázquez, F.P.; Soria-Mas, C.; Contreras, G.N. Afecto positivo y negativo: ¿Una dimensión bipolar o dos dimensiones unipolares independientes? Interdiscip. Rev. Psicol. Cienc. Afines 2012, 29, 151–164. [CrossRef]Osorio, H.D.L.; González, I.C.V.; Trujillo, L.E.T. Afectividad y Apoyo Social Percibido en Mujeres Gestantes: Un Análisis Comparativo. Rev. Colomb. Psicol. 2018, 27, 85–101. [CrossRef]Tobar, R.A.T.; Aguirre, K.V.B.; Gómez, L.J.G.; Mancipe, Á.P.S.; Parra, K.R.; Ortiz, L.M.G. Variables transdiagnósticas predictoras de los problemas emocionales y afectivos en una muestra colombiana. Duazary 2018, 15, 143–155. [CrossRef]Van Dierendonck, D.; Díaz, D.; Rodríguez-Carvajal, R.; Blanco, A.; Moreno-Jiménez, B. Ryff’s Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being, A Spanish Exploration. Soc. Indic. Res. 2008, 87, 473–479. [CrossRef]Arthaud-Day, M.L.; Rode, J.C.; Mooney, C.H.; Near, J.P. The Subjective Well-being Construct: A Test of its Convergent, Discriminant, and Factorial Validity. Soc. Indic. Res. 2005, 74, 445–476. [CrossRef]Henderson, L.W.; Knight, T. Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. Int. J. Wellbeing 2012, 2, 196–221. [CrossRef]Zuckerman, M.; Li, C.; Diener, E.F. Societal Conditions and the Gender Difference in Well-Being. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2017, 43, 329–336. [CrossRef] [PubMed]Mathews, G. Happiness, culture, and context. Int. J. Wellbeing 2012, 2, 299–312. [CrossRef]Batz, C.; Tay, L. Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being Past Research on Gender Differences in Subjective Well-being. In Handbook of Well-Being; DEF Publishers: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018.Narcotelenovelas: La Construcción de Nuevos Estereotipos de Mujer en la Ficción Televisiva de Colombia y México a Través del Retrato de una Realidad Social/—Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB. Available online: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/189628 (accessed on 9 November 2020).Tomáš Došek, B.; José Uribe Mendoza, C. Más allá de las reformas inclusivas. Los obstáculos (formales e informales) a la igualdad de género en América Latina Beyond Inclusive Reforms: (Formal and informal) Obstacles to Gender Equality in Latin America. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Políticas Soc. 2020, 65, 535–539. [CrossRef]Paladino, C.; Gorostiaga, D. Expresividad Emocional y Estereotipos de Género; Manuscrito Inédito. Departamento de Ciencia de la Comunicación, Universidad Nacional de la Plata: La Plata, Argentina, 2004. Available online: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/ 10915/3242 (accessed on 5 December 2020).Afectividad positiva y negativaSPANEBienestarPropiedades psicométricasEvaluación de la invarianzaAnálisis factorial confirmatorioCalidad de vidaPositive and negative experiencesSPANEWellbeingPsycho-metric propertiesMeasurement invarianceConfirmatory factor analysisColombian populationQuality of lifePsychological assessmentStructural equation modelingAdaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian PopulationArtículoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleAtribucióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2PublicationORIGINAL2021_adaptation_psychometric.pdf2021_adaptation_psychometric.pdfArtículoapplication/pdf7089783https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/954af788-3e4c-4f1d-a42d-c30f19a8d09b/downloadf5164849398490ec1a7280ec57be8ea9MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84334https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/416e18ff-ccc8-44cf-ab1a-c04c214d459f/download3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45MD52THUMBNAIL2021_adaptation_psychometric.pdf.jpg2021_adaptation_psychometric.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5850https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/a194d37a-a401-4b32-9434-00be7f2f96e3/download7fe4b839e21d80c77e48749d7f872d4cMD53TEXT2021_adaptation_psychometric.pdf.txt2021_adaptation_psychometric.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain64568https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/98e24029-4b37-4ffd-b03e-66bff4559736/downloadb850cc47767b7d62776c31443c920b41MD5420.500.12494/34902oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/349022024-08-10 09:33:28.473restrictedhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.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

Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population

Publicaciones similares