Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy

Introduction: Ths article is the result of research carried out by the research incubator ofProcedural Law of the Bucaramanga Campus of the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (ucc). Methodology: Analysis of certain aspects of the new small claims procedure fordeclaratory judgment, which the General...

Full description

Autores:
Tapias-Tapias, Amalia
Munóz-Sanchéz, Rafael Evelio
Latorre-Merchán, Rafael Ricardo
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UCC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/9056
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/1522
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9056
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2016 Dixi
id COOPER2_8658fdb108a0784e0f9d0d6878db5f68
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/9056
network_acronym_str COOPER2
network_name_str Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia– una visión desde la academia.
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Algumas vicissitudes do processo monitório na Colômbia: uma visão da academia
title Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
spellingShingle Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
title_short Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
title_full Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
title_fullStr Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
title_full_unstemmed Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
title_sort Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the Academy
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Tapias-Tapias, Amalia
Munóz-Sanchéz, Rafael Evelio
Latorre-Merchán, Rafael Ricardo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Tapias-Tapias, Amalia
Munóz-Sanchéz, Rafael Evelio
Latorre-Merchán, Rafael Ricardo
description Introduction: Ths article is the result of research carried out by the research incubator ofProcedural Law of the Bucaramanga Campus of the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (ucc). Methodology: Analysis of certain aspects of the new small claims procedure fordeclaratory judgment, which the General Procedure Code (cgp by its Spanish initials)successfully introduced into the legal system. Thse aspects are related to type, good faithof the creditor, exhaustion of procedural requirements, and propriety of interim measures.Th analysis was performed pursuant to Articles 419 to 421 and 590 of the cgp, Law 640 of2001, Decision C-726 of 2014 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia, and Calamandrei’stheory on small claims procedure. Results: Th legislature has shown the same proceduraltreatment to both pure and documentary small claims procedure, contrary to Calamandrei’s theory; the admission of pure small claims procedure implies that the judge supportsthe requirement of good faith payment to the creditor. In accordance with the norms onpre-trial conciliation, to initiate a small claims procedure classifid as special declaratory,the plaintif must prove compliance with the procedural requirements, that is, provideproof of having exhausted the attempt at conciliation. However, the plaintif may substitutethis with the request for and, logically, with the propriety of an interim measure, for whichsecurity must be furnished. Conclusions: In small claims procedure, the plaintif must provide proof of having exhausted procedural requirements. Finding an innominate measurein the context of small claims procedure with a view to guaranteeing the effctiveness ofthe right to credence will be a diffilt task.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-14T21:03:04Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-14T21:03:04Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/1522
10.16925/di.v18i24.1522
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9056
url https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/1522
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9056
identifier_str_mv 10.16925/di.v18i24.1522
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/1522/1933
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Dixi
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Dixi
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv DIXI; Vol 18 No 24 (2016)
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv DIXI; Vol. 18 Núm. 24 (2016)
dc.source.por.fl_str_mv DIXI; v. 18 n. 24 (2016)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2357-5891
0124-7255
institution Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1808788817440669696
spelling Tapias-Tapias, AmaliaMunóz-Sanchéz, Rafael EvelioLatorre-Merchán, Rafael Ricardo2016-08-222019-05-14T21:03:04Z2019-05-14T21:03:04Zhttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/152210.16925/di.v18i24.1522https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9056Introduction: Ths article is the result of research carried out by the research incubator ofProcedural Law of the Bucaramanga Campus of the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (ucc). Methodology: Analysis of certain aspects of the new small claims procedure fordeclaratory judgment, which the General Procedure Code (cgp by its Spanish initials)successfully introduced into the legal system. Thse aspects are related to type, good faithof the creditor, exhaustion of procedural requirements, and propriety of interim measures.Th analysis was performed pursuant to Articles 419 to 421 and 590 of the cgp, Law 640 of2001, Decision C-726 of 2014 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia, and Calamandrei’stheory on small claims procedure. Results: Th legislature has shown the same proceduraltreatment to both pure and documentary small claims procedure, contrary to Calamandrei’s theory; the admission of pure small claims procedure implies that the judge supportsthe requirement of good faith payment to the creditor. In accordance with the norms onpre-trial conciliation, to initiate a small claims procedure classifid as special declaratory,the plaintif must prove compliance with the procedural requirements, that is, provideproof of having exhausted the attempt at conciliation. However, the plaintif may substitutethis with the request for and, logically, with the propriety of an interim measure, for whichsecurity must be furnished. Conclusions: In small claims procedure, the plaintif must provide proof of having exhausted procedural requirements. Finding an innominate measurein the context of small claims procedure with a view to guaranteeing the effctiveness ofthe right to credence will be a diffilt task.ntroducción: resultado de la investigación desarrollada por el semillero de Derecho Procesal de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (ucc), sede Bucaramanga. Metodología: analizar algunas vicisitudes del nuevo proceso declarativo monitorio, el cual, en hora buena,introdujo el Código General del Proceso (cgp) al ordenamiento jurídico. Estas vicisitudes están relacionadas con la tipología, la buena fe del acreedor, el agotamiento del requisito de procedibilidad y la procedencia de medidas cautelares. El análisis se realiza con fundamentos en los artículos 419 al 421 y 590 del cgp, la Ley 640 del 2001, la Sentencia C-726 de 2014 de la Corte Constitucional y la teoría de Calamandrei acerca del proceso monitorio. Resultados: el legislador le ha dado el mismo tratamiento procesal al proceso monitorio puro y al documental, contrario a la teoría de Calamandrei; la admisión delproceso monitorio puro implica que el juez apoye el requerimiento de pago en la buena fe del acreedor. Al tenor de las normas relativas a la conciliación pre-procesal, para iniciar un proceso monitorio, clasifiado como declarativo especial, el demandante deberá acreditar el cumplimiento del requisito de procedibilidad, esto es, aportar prueba de haber agotado el intento de conciliación. No obstante, podrá suplirlo con la solicitud y lógicamente con la procedencia de una medida cautelar, para lo cual tendrá que prestar caución. Conclusiones: en el proceso monitorio, el demandante debe aportar prueba del agotamiento del requisito de procedibilidad. Encontrar una medida innominada en el contexto del proceso monitorio, en aras de garantizar la efectividad del derecho al crédito, será una ardua tarea.Introdução: resultado da pesquisa desenvolvida pelo grupo de pesquisa de Direito Processual da Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (ucc), sede Bucaramanga. Metodologia:analisar algumas vicissitudes do novo processo declarativo monitório, o qual, em tempooportuno, introduziu o Código Geral do Processo (cgp) ao ordenamento jurídico. Essasvicissitudes estão relacionadas com a tipologia, com a boa-fé do credor, com o exaurimento do requisito de procedibilidade e com a procedência de medidas cautelares. A análise realiza-se com fundamentos nos artigos 419 ao 421 e 590 do cgp, a Lei 640 de 2001, a Sentença C-726 de 2014 da Corte Constitucional e a teoria de Calamandrei acerca do processo monitório. Resultados: o legislador deu o mesmo tratamento processual ao processo monitório puro e ao documental, ao contrário da teoria de Calamandrei; a admissão do processo monitório puro implica que o juiz apoie o requerimento de pagamento na boa-fé do credor. Segundo as normas relativas à conciliação pré-processual, para iniciar um processo monitório, classifiado como declarativo especial, o requerente deverá comprovar o cumprimento do requisito de procedibilidade, isso é, provar ter exaurido a tentativa de conciliação. No entanto, poderá complementar com a solicitação e logicamente com a procedência de uma medida cautelar, para o qual terá que prestar caução. Conclusões:no processo monitório, o requerente deve provar o exaurimento do requisito de procedibilidade. Encontrar uma medida inominada no contexto do processo monitório, a fi de garantir a efetividade do direito ao crédito, será uma árdua tarefa.application/pdfspaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombiahttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/1522/1933Derechos de autor 2016 Dixiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2DIXI; Vol 18 No 24 (2016)DIXI; Vol. 18 Núm. 24 (2016)DIXI; v. 18 n. 24 (2016)2357-58910124-7255Aspects of Small Claims Procedure in Colombia: A View from the AcademyAlgunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia– una visión desde la academia.Algumas vicissitudes do processo monitório na Colômbia: uma visão da academiaArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublication20.500.12494/9056oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/90562024-07-16 13:33:39.911metadata.onlyhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com