Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia

In the present paper, an evaluation methodology of the sustainability was proposed in order to select the best way to value the sugarcane bagasse, taking into account the environmental management of the process, economic indexes, and social relevant aspects. To evaluate the environmental dimension,...

Full description

Autores:
Becerra Quiroz, Paola
Acevedo Pabón, Paola Andrea
Gonzalez, Luisa
Ortiz, Nidia
Cabeza Rojas, Iván Orlando
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UCC
Idioma:
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/16258
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1865137
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/16258
Palabra clave:
Bagazo de caña
Sostenibilidad
Análisis de Ciclo de Vida
Sugacane bagasse
Sostenibility
Life Cycle Assessment
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución
id COOPER2_85fe7541f02a47ff98f246541c3d3b61
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/16258
network_acronym_str COOPER2
network_name_str Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
title Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
spellingShingle Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
Bagazo de caña
Sostenibilidad
Análisis de Ciclo de Vida
Sugacane bagasse
Sostenibility
Life Cycle Assessment
title_short Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
title_full Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
title_fullStr Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
title_sort Sustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - Colombia
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Becerra Quiroz, Paola
Acevedo Pabón, Paola Andrea
Gonzalez, Luisa
Ortiz, Nidia
Cabeza Rojas, Iván Orlando
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Becerra Quiroz, Paola
Acevedo Pabón, Paola Andrea
Gonzalez, Luisa
Ortiz, Nidia
Cabeza Rojas, Iván Orlando
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Bagazo de caña
Sostenibilidad
Análisis de Ciclo de Vida
topic Bagazo de caña
Sostenibilidad
Análisis de Ciclo de Vida
Sugacane bagasse
Sostenibility
Life Cycle Assessment
dc.subject.other.spa.fl_str_mv Sugacane bagasse
Sostenibility
Life Cycle Assessment
description In the present paper, an evaluation methodology of the sustainability was proposed in order to select the best way to value the sugarcane bagasse, taking into account the environmental management of the process, economic indexes, and social relevant aspects. To evaluate the environmental dimension, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology and the LCA specialized software SIMAPRO was used. Six Impact categories were evaluated: acidification (Kg eq SO2), eutrophication (Kg eq PO4), climatic change (Kg eq CO2), photochemical oxidation (Kg eq C2H4), ozone layer depletion (Kg eq CFC-11) and abiotic damage (Kg eq Sb). It was found that in the case of co-generation use of sugarcane bagasse, the unitary process that generates greater environmental impact is the boiler and in the case of paper production, it’s the pulp bleaching. The economic dimension was evaluated using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) methodology. This methodology analyzes the economic aspects through the life cycle of the sugar cane bagasse. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was selected as the economic indicator, the value obtained for this indicator for the cogeneration process was 0,355 and for the paper production process 1,816. Both results show economic costeffectiveness. A stakeholder analysis was made in order to evaluate the social dimension. For each process, the power and interest criteria were evaluated. It was found that in the process of cogeneration, power and interest levels are 4 and 5,4 out of 10 respectively, and in the process of paper, power level was 3,1 and interest 5,2 out of 10. Finally, the results of the three dimensions were integrated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process methodology (AHP): Environmental dimension obtained with LCA, Economic dimension evaluated with LCC and social dimension calculated with stakeholder analysis. The main conclusion is that the most sustainable use of sugarcane bagasse is the raw material in the paper industry. Some sustainability recommendations were given for both processes evaluated.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-23T14:08:52Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-23T14:08:52Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.isbn.spa.fl_str_mv 9788895608624
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 22839216
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1865137
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/16258
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Becerra P., Acevedo P., Gonzalez L., Ortiz N., Cabeza I., 2018, Sustainability evaluation of sugarcane bagasse valorization alternatives in valle del cauca - colombia, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 65, 817-822 DOI: 10.3303/CET1865137
identifier_str_mv 9788895608624
22839216
Becerra P., Acevedo P., Gonzalez L., Ortiz N., Cabeza I., 2018, Sustainability evaluation of sugarcane bagasse valorization alternatives in valle del cauca - colombia, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 65, 817-822 DOI: 10.3303/CET1865137
url https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1865137
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/16258
dc.relation.isversionof.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/CET1865137
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Chemical Engineering Transactions
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Acevedo, P., 2012, Herramienta de análisis de alternativas de producción incorporando el LCA "Cuna a cuna" a los métodos tradicionales. Comparación de biodiesel de palma de higuerilla, PhD Thesis, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
ASOCAÑA, 2012, Informe de Sostenibilidad, Asocaña. Cali < http://www.asocana.org/modules/documentos/10179.aspx > accessed 13.01.2018.
Becerra, P., 2016, Evaluación de la Sustentabilidad del Aprovechamiento del Bagazo de Caña de Azúcar en el Valle del Cauca – Colombia a partir del Análisis de Ciclo Vida, MSc. Thesis, Universidad Distrital Francisco José Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Buddadee, B., Wirojanagud, W., Watts, D.J., Pitakaso, R., 2008, The development of multi-objective optimization model for excess bagasse utilization: A case study for Thailand, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(6), 380-391.
Dias, M.O.S., Cavalett, O., Filhob, R.M., Bonomi, A., 2014, Integrated first and second generation ethanol production from sugarcane, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37, 445-450.
Durairaj, S.K., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C., Tan, R.B.H., 2002, Evaluation of life cycle cost analysis methodologies. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(1), 30-39.
Freeman, R.E., 2010, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Cambridge University Press.
Luo, L., van der Voet, E., Huppes, G., 2009, Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(6-7), 1613-1619.
Luz, S.M., Caldeira-Pires, A., Ferrão, P.M.C. 2010, Environmental benefits of substituting talc by sugarcane bagasse fibers as reinforcement in polypropylene composites: Ecodesign and LCA as strategy for automotive components, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1135-1144.
Mashoko, L., Mbohwa, C., Thomas, V.M. 2013, Life cycle inventory of electricity cogeneration from bagasse in the South African sugar industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 42-49.
Mortari, D.A., Britto, M.C., Crnkovic, P.M. 2014. Correlation between activation energy and thermal decomposition yield of sugar cane bagasse under CO2/O2 and N2/O2,Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37, 31-36.
Mu, D., Seager, T., Rao, P.S., Zhao, F. 2010, Comparative life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol production: Biochemical versus thermochemical conversion, Environmental Management, 46(4), 565-578.
Ojeda, K., Ávila, O., Suárez, J., Kafarov, V. 2011, Evaluation of technological alternatives for process integration of sugarcane bagasse for sustainable biofuels production-Part 1, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89(3), 270-279.
Petersen, A.M., Melamu, R., Knoetze, J.H., Görgens, J.F. 2015, Comparison of second-generation processes for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse to liquid biofuels in terms of energy efficiency, pinch point analysis and Life Cycle Analysis, Energy Conversion and Management, 91, 292-301.
Sepiacci, P., Manca, D. 2015, Economic assessment of chemical plants supported by environmental and social sustainability, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 43, 2209-2214.
WCED, 1987, Our Common Future (Brundtlland Report), United Nations <http://www.un-documents.net/ourcommon-future.pdf > accessed 13.01.2018
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Atribución
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 817-825
dc.coverage.temporal.spa.fl_str_mv 65
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ingenierías, Ingeniería Industrial, Bogotá
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv Ingeniería Industrial
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Bogotá
institution Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/eed00d05-e792-4c8c-89c2-8d71fb321ffb/download
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/2171c55c-605c-4778-9419-960f34e4a100/download
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/12221695-9c80-4edd-bd60-0f51936c4bd8/download
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/f76582ae-7f79-43b1-9820-993b741c40b3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45
133a52442c1dd32bbf96b34e80fcaa9f
6062481c7c939da6d8cc521a4337a58d
732fa9efe3e4e85b82481e3bd3db1f53
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1808789245779771392
spelling Becerra Quiroz, PaolaAcevedo Pabón, Paola AndreaGonzalez, LuisaOrtiz, NidiaCabeza Rojas, Iván Orlando652020-01-23T14:08:52Z2020-01-23T14:08:52Z2018-05-01978889560862422839216https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1865137https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/16258Becerra P., Acevedo P., Gonzalez L., Ortiz N., Cabeza I., 2018, Sustainability evaluation of sugarcane bagasse valorization alternatives in valle del cauca - colombia, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 65, 817-822 DOI: 10.3303/CET1865137In the present paper, an evaluation methodology of the sustainability was proposed in order to select the best way to value the sugarcane bagasse, taking into account the environmental management of the process, economic indexes, and social relevant aspects. To evaluate the environmental dimension, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology and the LCA specialized software SIMAPRO was used. Six Impact categories were evaluated: acidification (Kg eq SO2), eutrophication (Kg eq PO4), climatic change (Kg eq CO2), photochemical oxidation (Kg eq C2H4), ozone layer depletion (Kg eq CFC-11) and abiotic damage (Kg eq Sb). It was found that in the case of co-generation use of sugarcane bagasse, the unitary process that generates greater environmental impact is the boiler and in the case of paper production, it’s the pulp bleaching. The economic dimension was evaluated using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) methodology. This methodology analyzes the economic aspects through the life cycle of the sugar cane bagasse. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was selected as the economic indicator, the value obtained for this indicator for the cogeneration process was 0,355 and for the paper production process 1,816. Both results show economic costeffectiveness. A stakeholder analysis was made in order to evaluate the social dimension. For each process, the power and interest criteria were evaluated. It was found that in the process of cogeneration, power and interest levels are 4 and 5,4 out of 10 respectively, and in the process of paper, power level was 3,1 and interest 5,2 out of 10. Finally, the results of the three dimensions were integrated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process methodology (AHP): Environmental dimension obtained with LCA, Economic dimension evaluated with LCC and social dimension calculated with stakeholder analysis. The main conclusion is that the most sustainable use of sugarcane bagasse is the raw material in the paper industry. Some sustainability recommendations were given for both processes evaluated.In the present paper, an evaluation methodology of the sustainability was proposed in order to select the best way to value the sugarcane bagasse, taking into account the environmental management of the process, economic indexes, and social relevant aspects. To evaluate the environmental dimension, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology and the LCA specialized software SIMAPRO was used. Six Impact categories were evaluated: acidification (Kg eq SO2), eutrophication (Kg eq PO4), climatic change (Kg eq CO2), photochemical oxidation (Kg eq C2H4), ozone layer depletion (Kg eq CFC-11) and abiotic damage (Kg eq Sb). It was found that in the case of co-generation use of sugarcane bagasse, the unitary process that generates greater environmental impact is the boiler and in the case of paper production, it’s the pulp bleaching. The economic dimension was evaluated using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) methodology. This methodology analyzes the economic aspects through the life cycle of the sugar cane bagasse. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was selected as the economic indicator, the value obtained for this indicator for the cogeneration process was 0,355 and for the paper production process 1,816. Both results show economic costeffectiveness. A stakeholder analysis was made in order to evaluate the social dimension. For each process, the power and interest criteria were evaluated. It was found that in the process of cogeneration, power and interest levels are 4 and 5,4 out of 10 respectively, and in the process of paper, power level was 3,1 and interest 5,2 out of 10. Finally, the results of the three dimensions were integrated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process methodology (AHP): Environmental dimension obtained with LCA, Economic dimension evaluated with LCC and social dimension calculated with stakeholder analysis. The main conclusion is that the most sustainable use of sugarcane bagasse is the raw material in the paper industry. Some sustainability recommendations were given for both processes evaluated.http://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001028111https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-3819https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/Medicion/graficas/verPerfiles.jsp?id_convocatoria=19&nroIdGrupo=00000000002960paola.acevedop@ucc.edu.cohttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=uBreqmgAAAAJ&hl=es817-825Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ingenierías, Ingeniería Industrial, BogotáIngeniería IndustrialBogotáhttps://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/CET1865137Chemical Engineering TransactionsAcevedo, P., 2012, Herramienta de análisis de alternativas de producción incorporando el LCA "Cuna a cuna" a los métodos tradicionales. Comparación de biodiesel de palma de higuerilla, PhD Thesis, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.ASOCAÑA, 2012, Informe de Sostenibilidad, Asocaña. Cali < http://www.asocana.org/modules/documentos/10179.aspx > accessed 13.01.2018.Becerra, P., 2016, Evaluación de la Sustentabilidad del Aprovechamiento del Bagazo de Caña de Azúcar en el Valle del Cauca – Colombia a partir del Análisis de Ciclo Vida, MSc. Thesis, Universidad Distrital Francisco José Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.Buddadee, B., Wirojanagud, W., Watts, D.J., Pitakaso, R., 2008, The development of multi-objective optimization model for excess bagasse utilization: A case study for Thailand, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(6), 380-391.Dias, M.O.S., Cavalett, O., Filhob, R.M., Bonomi, A., 2014, Integrated first and second generation ethanol production from sugarcane, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37, 445-450.Durairaj, S.K., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C., Tan, R.B.H., 2002, Evaluation of life cycle cost analysis methodologies. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(1), 30-39.Freeman, R.E., 2010, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Cambridge University Press.Luo, L., van der Voet, E., Huppes, G., 2009, Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(6-7), 1613-1619.Luz, S.M., Caldeira-Pires, A., Ferrão, P.M.C. 2010, Environmental benefits of substituting talc by sugarcane bagasse fibers as reinforcement in polypropylene composites: Ecodesign and LCA as strategy for automotive components, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1135-1144.Mashoko, L., Mbohwa, C., Thomas, V.M. 2013, Life cycle inventory of electricity cogeneration from bagasse in the South African sugar industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 42-49.Mortari, D.A., Britto, M.C., Crnkovic, P.M. 2014. Correlation between activation energy and thermal decomposition yield of sugar cane bagasse under CO2/O2 and N2/O2,Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37, 31-36.Mu, D., Seager, T., Rao, P.S., Zhao, F. 2010, Comparative life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol production: Biochemical versus thermochemical conversion, Environmental Management, 46(4), 565-578.Ojeda, K., Ávila, O., Suárez, J., Kafarov, V. 2011, Evaluation of technological alternatives for process integration of sugarcane bagasse for sustainable biofuels production-Part 1, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89(3), 270-279.Petersen, A.M., Melamu, R., Knoetze, J.H., Görgens, J.F. 2015, Comparison of second-generation processes for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse to liquid biofuels in terms of energy efficiency, pinch point analysis and Life Cycle Analysis, Energy Conversion and Management, 91, 292-301.Sepiacci, P., Manca, D. 2015, Economic assessment of chemical plants supported by environmental and social sustainability, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 43, 2209-2214.WCED, 1987, Our Common Future (Brundtlland Report), United Nations <http://www.un-documents.net/ourcommon-future.pdf > accessed 13.01.2018Bagazo de cañaSostenibilidadAnálisis de Ciclo de VidaSugacane bagasseSostenibilityLife Cycle AssessmentSustainability Evaluation of Sugarcane Bagasse Valorization Alternatives in Valle del Cauca - ColombiaArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAtribucióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2PublicationLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84334https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/eed00d05-e792-4c8c-89c2-8d71fb321ffb/download3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45MD52ORIGINALBagasse_Valorization_Alternatives.pdfBagasse_Valorization_Alternatives.pdfArtículoapplication/pdf636368https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/2171c55c-605c-4778-9419-960f34e4a100/download133a52442c1dd32bbf96b34e80fcaa9fMD51THUMBNAILBagasse_Valorization_Alternatives.pdf.jpgBagasse_Valorization_Alternatives.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5832https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/12221695-9c80-4edd-bd60-0f51936c4bd8/download6062481c7c939da6d8cc521a4337a58dMD53TEXTBagasse_Valorization_Alternatives.pdf.txtBagasse_Valorization_Alternatives.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain24528https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/f76582ae-7f79-43b1-9820-993b741c40b3/download732fa9efe3e4e85b82481e3bd3db1f53MD5420.500.12494/16258oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/162582024-08-10 21:00:07.401restrictedhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.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