Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge

Introduction: In Mexico, from the Reform of June 10, 2011, the ex officio constitutional and conventional protective role is imposed on local family judges as a guarantee of human rights when identifying suspicious categories. These are understood as prohibited traits that undermine human dignity th...

Full description

Autores:
Avendaño González, Luis
Pérez Pedraza, Everardo
Rabell García, Enrique
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UCC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/44359
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359
Palabra clave:
Suspicious categories
cohabitation
diffuse control
family judge.
categorías sospechosas
concubinato
control difuso
juzgador familiar.
categorias suspeitas
concubinato
controle difuso
juiz de família.
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forense
id COOPER2_7ab3ecf7495ddaaf3fdcbe77aadba10a
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/44359
network_acronym_str COOPER2
network_name_str Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Categorías sospechosas y control difuso en la práctica del juzgador familiar
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Categorias suspeitas e controle difuso na prática do juiz de família
title Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
spellingShingle Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
Suspicious categories
cohabitation
diffuse control
family judge.
categorías sospechosas
concubinato
control difuso
juzgador familiar.
categorias suspeitas
concubinato
controle difuso
juiz de família.
title_short Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
title_full Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
title_fullStr Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
title_full_unstemmed Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
title_sort Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Avendaño González, Luis
Pérez Pedraza, Everardo
Rabell García, Enrique
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Avendaño González, Luis
Pérez Pedraza, Everardo
Rabell García, Enrique
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Suspicious categories
cohabitation
diffuse control
family judge.
topic Suspicious categories
cohabitation
diffuse control
family judge.
categorías sospechosas
concubinato
control difuso
juzgador familiar.
categorias suspeitas
concubinato
controle difuso
juiz de família.
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv categorías sospechosas
concubinato
control difuso
juzgador familiar.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv categorias suspeitas
concubinato
controle difuso
juiz de família.
description Introduction: In Mexico, from the Reform of June 10, 2011, the ex officio constitutional and conventional protective role is imposed on local family judges as a guarantee of human rights when identifying suspicious categories. These are understood as prohibited traits that undermine human dignity through differential treatment and that put certain stereotyped groups at a disadvantage for no reason. Such inequality may be caused by the legislator when determining an abstract assumption (formal inequality), or by practice when applying an abstract rule to a specific case (substantive inequality). Therefore, the present research aims to identify and take down such restrictions based on the principle of equality. Methods: The research problem is approached from legal realism, particularizing the study in specific cases with their relevant explanation. In addition, the comparative method is used to compare applicable laws. Results: It is necessary to identify and resolve conflicts in which suspicious categories are present so that the local family judge does not violate the principle of non-discrimination. Conclusions: There should be a distinction established between formal and substantial equalities, which will guarantee, on the part of the local judge, the protection of human dignity and the fight against disadvantage as non discriminatory assumptions in practice.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-02T16:45:27Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-02T16:45:27Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361
10.16925/cf.v5i1.2361
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359
url https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359
identifier_str_mv 10.16925/cf.v5i1.2361
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2416
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2563
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forense
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forense
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia / Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 No. 1; 43-56
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 Núm. 1; 43-56
dc.source.por.fl_str_mv Colombia Forense; v. 5 n. 1; 43-56
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2145-9649
2145-0684
institution Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1808789004870483968
spelling Avendaño González, LuisPérez Pedraza, EverardoRabell García, Enrique2018-07-232022-03-02T16:45:27Z2022-03-02T16:45:27Zhttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/236110.16925/cf.v5i1.2361https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359Introduction: In Mexico, from the Reform of June 10, 2011, the ex officio constitutional and conventional protective role is imposed on local family judges as a guarantee of human rights when identifying suspicious categories. These are understood as prohibited traits that undermine human dignity through differential treatment and that put certain stereotyped groups at a disadvantage for no reason. Such inequality may be caused by the legislator when determining an abstract assumption (formal inequality), or by practice when applying an abstract rule to a specific case (substantive inequality). Therefore, the present research aims to identify and take down such restrictions based on the principle of equality. Methods: The research problem is approached from legal realism, particularizing the study in specific cases with their relevant explanation. In addition, the comparative method is used to compare applicable laws. Results: It is necessary to identify and resolve conflicts in which suspicious categories are present so that the local family judge does not violate the principle of non-discrimination. Conclusions: There should be a distinction established between formal and substantial equalities, which will guarantee, on the part of the local judge, the protection of human dignity and the fight against disadvantage as non discriminatory assumptions in practice.Introducción: a partir de la Reforma del 10 de junio del 2011, en México se impone la función protectora Constitucional y convencional ex officio para los juzgadores familiares del orden local, como garantía de los derechos humanos al identificar las categorías sospechosas. Estas se entienden como rasgos prohibidos que menoscaban la dignidad humana por medio de un trato diferenciado, y que producen desventaja hacia determinados grupos estereotipados sin que exista una razón que la justifique. Tal desigualdad puede tener su origen en el legislador al determinar el supuesto abstracto (desigualdad formal), o bien en la práctica, al aplicar la norma abstracta al caso concreto (desigualdad sustantiva); ante ello, es propósito de la presente investigación identificar y abatir tales restricciones a partir del principio de igualdad. Metodología: la problemática de la investigación se aborda desde el realismo jurídico, particularizando el estudio a casos específicos con su respectiva explicación; además, se emplea el método comparativo en la confrontación de legislaciones aplicables. Resultados: corresponde identificar y resolver los conflictos donde se presenten categorías sospechosas, para que el Juez de lo familiar local no vulnere el principio de no discriminación. Conclusiones: es preciso establecer una distinción entre igualdades formal y sustancial, el cual constituye un presupuesto que garantizará, por parte del juzgador local, la protección de la dignidad humana y el combate a la desventaja como presupuestos no discriminatorios en la práctica.Introdução: da Reforma de 10 de junho de 2011, no México foi imposta a função protetora constitucional e convencional ex officio aos juízes de família da ordem local, como garantia dos direitos humanos na identificação de categorias suspeitas. Isto é, traços proibidos que prejudicam a dignidade humana através de um tratamento diferenciado, e que afetam certos grupos estereotipados sem justificação. Tal desigualdade pode se originar no legislador ao determinar o pressuposto abstrato (desigualdade formal), ou na prática, ao aplicar a regra abstrata ao caso concreto (desigualdade substantiva). Em vista disso, o objetivo da presente investigação é identificar e derrubar tais restrições, com base no princípio da igualdade. Metodologia: aborda-se o problema da investigação a partir do realismo jurídico, e particulariza-se o estudo de casos específicos com suas respectivas explicações. Além disso, utiliza-se o método comparativo na comparação de legislações aplicáveis. Resultados: é necessário identificar e resolver os conflitos relacionados com as categorias suspeitas, para que o juiz local de família não viole o princípio da não discriminação. Conclusões: é necessário estabelecer uma distinção entre igualdade formal e substancial. Isso garantirá, por parte do juiz local, a proteção da dignidade humana e a luta contra as desvantagens como orçamentos não discriminatórios na prática.application/pdfspaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia / Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenseshttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2416https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2563Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forenseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 No. 1; 43-56Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 Núm. 1; 43-56Colombia Forense; v. 5 n. 1; 43-562145-96492145-0684Suspicious categoriescohabitationdiffuse controlfamily judge.categorías sospechosasconcubinatocontrol difusojuzgador familiar.categorias suspeitasconcubinatocontrole difusojuiz de família.Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family JudgeCategorías sospechosas y control difuso en la práctica del juzgador familiarCategorias suspeitas e controle difuso na prática do juiz de famíliaArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublication20.500.12494/44359oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/443592024-07-16 13:32:51.541metadata.onlyhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com