Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge
Introduction: In Mexico, from the Reform of June 10, 2011, the ex officio constitutional and conventional protective role is imposed on local family judges as a guarantee of human rights when identifying suspicious categories. These are understood as prohibited traits that undermine human dignity th...
- Autores:
-
Avendaño González, Luis
Pérez Pedraza, Everardo
Rabell García, Enrique
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UCC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/44359
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359
- Palabra clave:
- Suspicious categories
cohabitation
diffuse control
family judge.
categorías sospechosas
concubinato
control difuso
juzgador familiar.
categorias suspeitas
concubinato
controle difuso
juiz de família.
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forense
| id |
COOPER2_7ab3ecf7495ddaaf3fdcbe77aadba10a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/44359 |
| network_acronym_str |
COOPER2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio UCC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge |
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Categorías sospechosas y control difuso en la práctica del juzgador familiar |
| dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Categorias suspeitas e controle difuso na prática do juiz de família |
| title |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge |
| spellingShingle |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge Suspicious categories cohabitation diffuse control family judge. categorías sospechosas concubinato control difuso juzgador familiar. categorias suspeitas concubinato controle difuso juiz de família. |
| title_short |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge |
| title_full |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge |
| title_fullStr |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge |
| title_sort |
Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family Judge |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Avendaño González, Luis Pérez Pedraza, Everardo Rabell García, Enrique |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Avendaño González, Luis Pérez Pedraza, Everardo Rabell García, Enrique |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Suspicious categories cohabitation diffuse control family judge. |
| topic |
Suspicious categories cohabitation diffuse control family judge. categorías sospechosas concubinato control difuso juzgador familiar. categorias suspeitas concubinato controle difuso juiz de família. |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
categorías sospechosas concubinato control difuso juzgador familiar. |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
categorias suspeitas concubinato controle difuso juiz de família. |
| description |
Introduction: In Mexico, from the Reform of June 10, 2011, the ex officio constitutional and conventional protective role is imposed on local family judges as a guarantee of human rights when identifying suspicious categories. These are understood as prohibited traits that undermine human dignity through differential treatment and that put certain stereotyped groups at a disadvantage for no reason. Such inequality may be caused by the legislator when determining an abstract assumption (formal inequality), or by practice when applying an abstract rule to a specific case (substantive inequality). Therefore, the present research aims to identify and take down such restrictions based on the principle of equality. Methods: The research problem is approached from legal realism, particularizing the study in specific cases with their relevant explanation. In addition, the comparative method is used to compare applicable laws. Results: It is necessary to identify and resolve conflicts in which suspicious categories are present so that the local family judge does not violate the principle of non-discrimination. Conclusions: There should be a distinction established between formal and substantial equalities, which will guarantee, on the part of the local judge, the protection of human dignity and the fight against disadvantage as non discriminatory assumptions in practice. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-02T16:45:27Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-02T16:45:27Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-23 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361 10.16925/cf.v5i1.2361 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359 |
| url |
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.16925/cf.v5i1.2361 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2416 https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2563 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forense |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forense http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia / Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses |
| dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 No. 1; 43-56 |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 Núm. 1; 43-56 |
| dc.source.por.fl_str_mv |
Colombia Forense; v. 5 n. 1; 43-56 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2145-9649 2145-0684 |
| institution |
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1814246774706012160 |
| spelling |
Avendaño González, LuisPérez Pedraza, EverardoRabell García, Enrique2018-07-232022-03-02T16:45:27Z2022-03-02T16:45:27Zhttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/236110.16925/cf.v5i1.2361https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44359Introduction: In Mexico, from the Reform of June 10, 2011, the ex officio constitutional and conventional protective role is imposed on local family judges as a guarantee of human rights when identifying suspicious categories. These are understood as prohibited traits that undermine human dignity through differential treatment and that put certain stereotyped groups at a disadvantage for no reason. Such inequality may be caused by the legislator when determining an abstract assumption (formal inequality), or by practice when applying an abstract rule to a specific case (substantive inequality). Therefore, the present research aims to identify and take down such restrictions based on the principle of equality. Methods: The research problem is approached from legal realism, particularizing the study in specific cases with their relevant explanation. In addition, the comparative method is used to compare applicable laws. Results: It is necessary to identify and resolve conflicts in which suspicious categories are present so that the local family judge does not violate the principle of non-discrimination. Conclusions: There should be a distinction established between formal and substantial equalities, which will guarantee, on the part of the local judge, the protection of human dignity and the fight against disadvantage as non discriminatory assumptions in practice.Introducción: a partir de la Reforma del 10 de junio del 2011, en México se impone la función protectora Constitucional y convencional ex officio para los juzgadores familiares del orden local, como garantía de los derechos humanos al identificar las categorías sospechosas. Estas se entienden como rasgos prohibidos que menoscaban la dignidad humana por medio de un trato diferenciado, y que producen desventaja hacia determinados grupos estereotipados sin que exista una razón que la justifique. Tal desigualdad puede tener su origen en el legislador al determinar el supuesto abstracto (desigualdad formal), o bien en la práctica, al aplicar la norma abstracta al caso concreto (desigualdad sustantiva); ante ello, es propósito de la presente investigación identificar y abatir tales restricciones a partir del principio de igualdad. Metodología: la problemática de la investigación se aborda desde el realismo jurídico, particularizando el estudio a casos específicos con su respectiva explicación; además, se emplea el método comparativo en la confrontación de legislaciones aplicables. Resultados: corresponde identificar y resolver los conflictos donde se presenten categorías sospechosas, para que el Juez de lo familiar local no vulnere el principio de no discriminación. Conclusiones: es preciso establecer una distinción entre igualdades formal y sustancial, el cual constituye un presupuesto que garantizará, por parte del juzgador local, la protección de la dignidad humana y el combate a la desventaja como presupuestos no discriminatorios en la práctica.Introdução: da Reforma de 10 de junho de 2011, no México foi imposta a função protetora constitucional e convencional ex officio aos juízes de família da ordem local, como garantia dos direitos humanos na identificação de categorias suspeitas. Isto é, traços proibidos que prejudicam a dignidade humana através de um tratamento diferenciado, e que afetam certos grupos estereotipados sem justificação. Tal desigualdade pode se originar no legislador ao determinar o pressuposto abstrato (desigualdade formal), ou na prática, ao aplicar a regra abstrata ao caso concreto (desigualdade substantiva). Em vista disso, o objetivo da presente investigação é identificar e derrubar tais restrições, com base no princípio da igualdade. Metodologia: aborda-se o problema da investigação a partir do realismo jurídico, e particulariza-se o estudo de casos específicos com suas respectivas explicações. Além disso, utiliza-se o método comparativo na comparação de legislações aplicáveis. Resultados: é necessário identificar e resolver os conflitos relacionados com as categorias suspeitas, para que o juiz local de família não viole o princípio da não discriminação. Conclusões: é necessário estabelecer uma distinção entre igualdade formal e substancial. Isso garantirá, por parte do juiz local, a proteção da dignidade humana e a luta contra as desvantagens como orçamentos não discriminatórios na prática.application/pdfspaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia / Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenseshttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2416https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/ml/article/view/2361/2563Derechos de autor 2018 Colombia Forenseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 No. 1; 43-56Colombia Forense; Vol. 5 Núm. 1; 43-56Colombia Forense; v. 5 n. 1; 43-562145-96492145-0684Suspicious categoriescohabitationdiffuse controlfamily judge.categorías sospechosasconcubinatocontrol difusojuzgador familiar.categorias suspeitasconcubinatocontrole difusojuiz de família.Suspicious Categories and Diffuse Control in the Practice of the Family JudgeCategorías sospechosas y control difuso en la práctica del juzgador familiarCategorias suspeitas e controle difuso na prática do juiz de famíliaArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublication20.500.12494/44359oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/443592024-07-16 13:32:51.541metadata.onlyhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |