The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class
Introduction: Academic social participation addresses student engagement behaviors that involve social interactions with peers and teachers. Objective: Perceived teacher behavior, task value, academic self-efficacy, class enjoyment and shame’s role in predicting academic social participation was ana...
- Autores:
-
Sánchez-Rosas, Javier
Takaya, Paula Belén
Molinari, Alicia Verónica
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UCC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/9597
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/pe/article/view/1327
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9597
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos de autor 2016 Pensando Psicología
id |
COOPER2_64e90e6e07b506d8551652bc896ef9d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/9597 |
network_acronym_str |
COOPER2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UCC |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
El papel del comportamiento del profesor, la motivación y la emoción en la predicción de la participación social académica en clase |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O papel do comportamento do professor, da motivação e da emoção na predição da participação social acadêmica em aula |
title |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
spellingShingle |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
title_short |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
title_full |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
title_fullStr |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
title_sort |
The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Sánchez-Rosas, Javier Takaya, Paula Belén Molinari, Alicia Verónica |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Sánchez-Rosas, Javier Takaya, Paula Belén Molinari, Alicia Verónica |
description |
Introduction: Academic social participation addresses student engagement behaviors that involve social interactions with peers and teachers. Objective: Perceived teacher behavior, task value, academic self-efficacy, class enjoyment and shame’s role in predicting academic social participation was analyzed. Method: Psychology students from a large national university completed self-report questionnaires assessing the model variables. A proposed model was evaluated by path analysis. Results: Model showed good fit to thedata, explaining 31% of variance. Positive influences were detected of perceived teacher behavior on task value (β = 0.42), academic self-efficacy (β = 0.19), and class enjoyment (β = 0.24); of task value on class enjoyment (β = 0.52); and of class enjoyment on academic social participation (β = 0.44). Academic self-efficacy negatively affected class shame (β = -0.38), while class shame (β = -0.44) and task value (β = -0.24) showed a negative influence on academic social participation. Conclusion: Utility of modifying teacher behavior and motivation as a means to affect emotion was demonstrated. Class enjoyment and shame were the stronger predictors of academic social participation. Individual variables’ importance in moderating contextual influence on engagement was suggested. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-14T21:11:49Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-14T21:11:49Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/pe/article/view/1327 10.16925/pe.v12i19.1327 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9597 |
url |
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/pe/article/view/1327 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9597 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.16925/pe.v12i19.1327 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/pe/article/view/1327/1472 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Pensando Psicología |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Pensando Psicología http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
Pensando Psicología; Vol 12 No 19 (2016); 39-53 |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pensando Psicología; Vol. 12 Núm. 19 (2016); 39-53 |
dc.source.por.fl_str_mv |
Pensando Psicología; v. 12 n. 19 (2016); 39-53 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2382-3984 1900-3099 |
institution |
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
_version_ |
1814246648184832000 |
spelling |
Sánchez-Rosas, JavierTakaya, Paula BelénMolinari, Alicia Verónica2016-04-012019-05-14T21:11:49Z2019-05-14T21:11:49Zhttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/pe/article/view/132710.16925/pe.v12i19.1327https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9597Introduction: Academic social participation addresses student engagement behaviors that involve social interactions with peers and teachers. Objective: Perceived teacher behavior, task value, academic self-efficacy, class enjoyment and shame’s role in predicting academic social participation was analyzed. Method: Psychology students from a large national university completed self-report questionnaires assessing the model variables. A proposed model was evaluated by path analysis. Results: Model showed good fit to thedata, explaining 31% of variance. Positive influences were detected of perceived teacher behavior on task value (β = 0.42), academic self-efficacy (β = 0.19), and class enjoyment (β = 0.24); of task value on class enjoyment (β = 0.52); and of class enjoyment on academic social participation (β = 0.44). Academic self-efficacy negatively affected class shame (β = -0.38), while class shame (β = -0.44) and task value (β = -0.24) showed a negative influence on academic social participation. Conclusion: Utility of modifying teacher behavior and motivation as a means to affect emotion was demonstrated. Class enjoyment and shame were the stronger predictors of academic social participation. Individual variables’ importance in moderating contextual influence on engagement was suggested.Introducción: la participación social académica aborda los comportamientos de participación estudiantil que implican interacciones sociales con compañeros y profesores. Objetivo: se analizó el papel del comportamiento percibido del profesor, el valor de la tarea, la autoeficacia académica, el disfrute y la vergüenza en clase en la predicción de la participación social académica. Método: los estudiantes de psicología de una importante universidad nacional completaron cuestionarios de autoinforme que evaluaban las variables del modelo. Se evaluó un modelo propuesto mediante el análisis de senderos. Resultados: el modelo mostró un buen ajuste a los datos, explicando el 31% de la varianza. Se detectaron influencias positivas del comportamiento percibido del profesor en el valor de la tarea (β = 0,42), la autoeficacia académica (β = 0,19) y el disfrute de la clase (β = 0,24); del valor de la tarea en el disfrute de la clase (β = 0,52); y del disfrute de la clase en la participación social académica (β = 0,44). La autoeficacia académica afectó negativamente la vergüenza en clase (β = -0,38), mientras que la vergüenza en clase (β = -0,44) y el valor de la tarea (β = -0,24) mostraron una influencia negativa en la participación social académica. Conclusión: se demostró la utilidad de modificar el comportamiento del profesor y la motivación como medio para afectar las emociones. El disfrute y la vergüenza en clase fueron los predictores más fuertes de la participación social académica. Se sugirió la importancia de las variables individuales en la moderación de la influencia contextual en la participación.Introdução: a participação social acadêmica aborda os comportamentos de participação estudantil que implicam interações sociais com companheiros e professores. Objetivo: analisou-se o papel do comportamento percebido do professor, o valor da tarefa, a autoeficácia acadêmica, o disfrutar e a vergonha em aula na predição da participação social acadêmica. Método: os estudantes de psicologia de uma importante universidade nacional preencheram questionários de autorrelato que avaliavam as variáveis do modelo. Avaliou-se um modelo proposto mediante a análise de trajetórias. Resultados: o modelo mostrou um bom ajuste aos dados, explicando 31% da variância. Detectaram-se influências positivas do comportamento percebido do professor no valor da tarefa (β = 0,42), a autoeficácia acadêmica (β = 0,19) e o desfrutar da aula (β = 0,24); do valor da tarefa no desfrutar da aula (β = 0,52) e do desfrutar da aula na participação social acadêmica (β = 0,44). A autoeficácia acadêmica afetou negativamente a vergonha em aula (β = -0,38), enquanto a vergonha em aula (β = -0,44) e o valor da tarefa (β = -0,24) mostraram uma influência negativa na participação social acadêmica. Conclusão: demonstrou-se a utilidade de modificar o comportamento do professor e a motivação como meio para afetar as emoções. O desfrutar da aula e a vergonha foram os preditores mais fortes da participação social acadêmica. Sugeriu-se a importância das variáveis individuais na moderação da influência contextual na participação.application/pdfengUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombiahttps://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/pe/article/view/1327/1472Derechos de autor 2016 Pensando Psicologíainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Pensando Psicología; Vol 12 No 19 (2016); 39-53Pensando Psicología; Vol. 12 Núm. 19 (2016); 39-53Pensando Psicología; v. 12 n. 19 (2016); 39-532382-39841900-3099The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in ClassEl papel del comportamiento del profesor, la motivación y la emoción en la predicción de la participación social académica en claseO papel do comportamento do professor, da motivação e da emoção na predição da participação social acadêmica em aulaArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublication20.500.12494/9597oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/95972024-07-16 13:25:15.815metadata.onlyhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |