Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia

The assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis (SCM) in dairy farms is essential to evaluate the health status of mammary gland. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of SCM in dual purpose livestock systems in Arauca, Colombia, through the analysis the values found on-farm dia...

Full description

Autores:: Salamanca Carreño, Arcesio
Vélez-Terranova, Mauricio
Tamasaukas, Rita
Jáuregui-Jiménez, Raúl
Parés-Casanova, Pere M.
Arias-Landazábal, José N.

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2023

Institución:: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Repositorio:: Repositorio UCC

Idioma:

id	COOPER2_5a8e01c55a8b1e0316d0528f95d308e2
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/52706
network_acronym_str	COOPER2
network_name_str	Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia
title	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia
spellingShingle	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia Conductividad eléctrica Estatus sanitario Nivel de prevalencia Glándula mamaria Pruebas en campo Electric conductivity health status level prevalence mammary gland on-farm tests
title_short	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia
title_full	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia
title_fullStr	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia
title_full_unstemmed	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia
title_sort	Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Salamanca Carreño, Arcesio Vélez-Terranova, Mauricio Tamasaukas, Rita Jáuregui-Jiménez, Raúl Parés-Casanova, Pere M. Arias-Landazábal, José N.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Salamanca Carreño, Arcesio Vélez-Terranova, Mauricio Tamasaukas, Rita Jáuregui-Jiménez, Raúl Parés-Casanova, Pere M. Arias-Landazábal, José N.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Conductividad eléctrica Estatus sanitario Nivel de prevalencia Glándula mamaria Pruebas en campo
topic	Conductividad eléctrica Estatus sanitario Nivel de prevalencia Glándula mamaria Pruebas en campo Electric conductivity health status level prevalence mammary gland on-farm tests
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv	Electric conductivity health status level prevalence mammary gland on-farm tests
description	The assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis (SCM) in dairy farms is essential to evaluate the health status of mammary gland. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of SCM in dual purpose livestock systems in Arauca, Colombia, through the analysis the values found on-farm diagnostic California Mastitis Test (CMT) and Electric Conductivity (EC) test. Milk samples were taken from the individual mammary quarters of 481 cows. The cow level prevalence, per affected individual mammary quarters prevalence and the mammary quarter level prevalence were determined according to the values obtained for each test using two methods of analysis. An ANOVA was performed to determine the difference between prevalences. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used for intertest agreement, and an analysis of sensitivity and specificity. The cow level prevalence was similar between the tests (CMT = 31.4%; EC = 29.7%). The quarter-level prevalence was lower with EC (11.4% vs 14.3%) (p < 0.05). The agreement test between CMT (0) and EC ranged between 0.20 and 0.25. Despite the low agreement found between the tests, they can be useful in determining the health status of the mammary gland in the dual-purpose livestock systems of the Colombian Orinoquia
publishDate	2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2023-09-18T16:59:11Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2023-09-18T16:59:11Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2023-09-13
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículos Científicos
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	09741844
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2023.2256829 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52706
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.none.fl_str_mv	Salamanca-Carreño, Vélez-Terranova, Tamasaukas, Jáuregui-Jiménez, Parés-Casanova,Arias-Landazábal. 2023. Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 51 (1):599-607
identifier_str_mv	09741844 Salamanca-Carreño, Vélez-Terranova, Tamasaukas, Jáuregui-Jiménez, Parés-Casanova,Arias-Landazábal. 2023. Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 51 (1):599-607
url	https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2023.2256829 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52706
dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv	https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09712119.2023.2256829
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.none.fl_str_mv	Journal of Applied Animal Research
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv	Acosta Moreno A, Mira Hernandez J, Posada Arias S. 2017. Tópicos en mastitis bovina: desde la etiología hasta algunas terapias alternativas. J Agricult Anim Sci. 6(1):42–58. doi:10.22507/jals.v6n1a4. Aguilar Aldrete A, Bañuelos Pineda J, Pimienta Barrios E, Aguilar Flores A, Torres Moran P. 2014. Prevalencia de mastitis subclínica en la Región de Ciénaga del Estado de Jalisco. Abanico Vet. 4(1):24–31. AL-Edany AA, Khudor M, AL-Mousawi K. 2012. Comparison of three indirect tests for the diagnosis of bovine subclinical mastitis caused by coagulase negative staphylococci with their susceptibility to seven antibiotics. Bas J Vet Res. 11(1):75–83. Andresen H. 2001. Mastitis: prevención y control. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 12(2):55– 64. Arauca. 2022. Clima: Arauca, Aeropuerto Santiago Pérez (En línea). https:// es.allmetsat.com/clima/venezuela.php?code=80099. Bachaya HA, Raza MA, Murtaza S, Akbar UR. 2011. Subclinical bovine mastitis in Muzaffar Garh district of Punjab (Pakistan). J Anim Plant Sci. 21 (1):16–19. Badiuzzaman M, Samad MA, Siddiki SH, Islam MT, Saha S. 2015. Subclinical mastitis in lactating cows: comparison of four screening tests and effect of animal factors on its occurrence. Bangl J Vet Med. 13(41):41–50. doi:10.3329/BJVM.V13I2.26627. Bedoya CC, Castañeda VH, Wolter W. 2007. Métodos de detección de la mastitis bovina. Rev. Electrón. Vet. 8(9):1–17. Calderon RA, Rodríguez RV, Arrieta BG, Mattar VS. 2011. Prevalence of mastitis in dual purpose cattle farms in Monteria (Colombia): etiology and antibacterial susceptibility. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 24(1):19–28. Castillo M, Suniaga J, Rojas G, Hernández JA. 2007. Prevalencia de mastitis subclinica en la zona alta del estdo Mérida. Estudio Preliminar Agricult Andina. 13:65–70. Cepero RO, Castillo JC, Salado RJ, Monteaguado JE. 2006. Detección de la mastitis subclínica mediante diferentes técnicas diagnósticas en unidades bovinas. Rev Produc Anim. 18(1):1–11. Deb R, Kumar A, Chakraborty S, Kumar Verma A, Tiwuari R, Dhama K, Kumar S. 2013. Trends in diagnosis and control of Bovine Mastitis: a review. Pakist J Biol Sci. 16(23):1653–1661. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2013.1653.1661. Draminski. 1987.Mastitis Detector. Electrónica en Agricultura.Manual de uso. ISO 9001 CE. https://www.draminski.es/agri/detectores-de-mastitis/. Elizalde EF, Signorini ML, Canavesio VR, Cuatrin A, Tarabla HD, Calvinho LF. 2019. Medición de la Conductividad Eléctrica en Leche como Método Diagnóstico de Mastitis Subclínica Bovina. Rev FAVE - Cienc Vet. 8 (1):15–28.8. Florio-Luis de Pineda J, Pineda M, Polanco M, Mendoza J, Díaz N, Florio-Luis G. 2015. Estrategias de prevención y control de mastitis como apoyo para preservar un rebaño bovino en los Llanos Centrales, Venezuela. Actas Iberoam Conserv Anim. 6:598–616. García-Sánchez F, Sánchez-Santana T, López-Vigoa O, Benítez- Álvarez MÁ. 2018. Prevalencia de mastitis subclínica y microorganismos asociados a esta. Pastos y Forrajes. 41(1):35–40. Gómez-Quispe OE, Santivañez-Ballón CS, Arauco-Villa F, Espezua-Flores OH, Manrique-Meza J. 2015. Criterios de Interpretación para California Mastitis Test en el Diagnóstico de Mastitis Subclínica en Bovinos. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 26(1):86–95. doi:10.15381/rivep.v26i1.10912. Guízar JI, Bedolla JL. 2008. Determinación de la prevalencia de mastitis bovina en el municipio de Tarímbaro, Michoacán, mediante la prueba de California. Rev Electrón Vet. 9(10):1–35. Hernández JM, Bedoya JL. 2008. Importancia del conteo de células somáticas en la calidad de la leche. Rev Elect Vet. 9(9):1–35. [IDEAM]. 2000. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. Información Aeronáutica. Climatología. Climatología. Precipitación media mensual y número de días: http://bart.ideam.gov. co/cliciu/arauca/precipitacion.htm. Ilie LI, Tudor L, Galis AM. 2010. The electrical conductivity of cattle milk and the possibility of mastitis diagnosis in Romania. Lucrări Ştiinłifice Medicină Veterinară. 43:220–227. InfoStat. 2020. InfoStat Versión 2020. Manual del Usuario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. https://www.infostat.com.ar/index. php?mod=page&id=46. Iraguha B, Hamudikuwanda H, Mushonga B, Kandiwa E, Mpatswenumugabo JP. 2017. Comparison of cow-side diagnostic tests for subclinical mastitis of dairy cows in Musanze district, Rwanda. J South Afric Vet Assoc. 88:1–6. doi:10.4102/jsava.v88i0.1464. Kamal RM, Bayoumi MA, Abd El Aal SF. 2014. Correlation between some direct and indirect tests for screen detection of subclinical mastitis. Int Food Res J. 21(3):1249–1254. Kaşikci G, Cetin O, Bingol BE, Gunduz MC. 2012. Relations between electrical conductivity, somatic cell count, California mastitis test and some quality parameters in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 36(1):49–55. doi:10.3906/vet-1103-4. Khatun M, Clark CE, Lyons NA, Thomson PC, Kerrisk KL, García SC. 2017. Early detection of clinical mastitis from electrical conductivity data in an automatic milking system. Anim Produc. Sc. 57(7):1226–1232. doi:10.1071/AN16707. Maldonado-Arias DF, Santos-Calderón CR, Quilapanta-Guamán AE, Mena- Miño LA. 2022. Diagnosis of subclinical Mastitis using three methods for control and treatment. Dom Cien. 8(1):773–790. doi:10.23857/dc. v8i1.2603. Manterola C, Otzen T. 2015. Valoración Clínica del Riesgo, Interpretación y Utilidad Práctica. Int J Morphol. 33(3):842–849. doi:10.4067/S0717- 95022015000300006. McHugh ML. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. (Zagreb). 22(3):276–282. Medina CM, Montaldo VH. 2003. El uso de la prueba de conductividad eléctrica y su relación con la prueba de California para mastitis. CNM. In: V Congreso Nacional de Control de Mastitis. México: Aguascalientes; p. 29–31. de mayo. Mellenberger R, Roth CJ. 2000. Hoja de Información de la Prueba de Mastitis California (CMT). https://bit.ly/43iegJq. Mendoza J, Vera Y, Peña L. 2017. Prevalencia de mastitis subclinica, microorganismos asociados y factores de riesgo identificdos en hatos de la provinvia de Pamplona, Norte de Santander. Rev Med Vet Zoot. 64 (2):11–24. doi:10.15446/rfmvz.v64n2.67209. Mera Andrade R, Muñoz Espinoza M, Artieda Rojas JR, Ortíz Tirado P, González Salas R, Vega Falcón V. 2017. Mastitis bovina y su repercusión en la calidad de la leche. Revi Elect Vet. 8(11):1–16. Mohammadsadegh M, Gharagoslu F, Bokaii S. 2007. Study the efficacy of an electric conductivity detector (Mas D Tec) in sub clinical mastitis diagnosis. Vet J Islam. 4:15–22. Murphy SC, Martin NH, Barbano DM, Wiedmann M. 2016. Influence ofraw milk quality on processed dairyproducts: how do raw milk quality testresults relate to product quality and yield? J Dairy Sc. 99:10128–10149. doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11172. Musser JM, Anderson JL, Caballero M, Amaya D, Maroto-Puga J. 1998. Evaluation of a hand-held electrical conductivity meter for detection of subclinical mastitis in cattle. Am J Vet Res. 59(9):1087–1091. NMC. 2017. National Mastitis Council, Inc. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Minnesota: Third printing. Pérez-Ruano M, Tarafa-Zambrana L. 2017. Evaluación del equipo Mas-D-Tec en el diagnóstico de campo de mastitis subclinica en el ganado bovino. Rev Salud Anim. 39(3):1–7. Petzer IM, Karzis J, Meyer IA, van der Schans TJ. 2013. A cost-benefit model comparing the California Milk Cell Test and Milk Electrical Resistance Test. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 80(1):1–14. doi:10.4102/ojvr.v80i1.538. Philpot W, Nickerson S. 2001. Winning the fight against Mastitis. I. 2. Westfalia Surge eds. Estados Unidos de América. Pinzón TA, Moreno FC, Rodríguez MG. 2009. Efectos de la mastitis subclínica en algunos hatos de la cuenca lechera del Alto Chicamocha (departamento de Boyacá). Rev Medic Vet. 17:23–35. Ponce P, Ribot A, Capdevila JZ, Villoch A. 2010. Manual aprendiendo de la leche PROCAL. San José de las Lajas. Cuba: CENSA, Minagricultura. [PROCOLOMBIA]. 2018. Aliado estrategico del sector lácteos. Mincomercio Industria y Turismo. https://bit.ly/3MpNIji. Ramírez Sánchez JM. 2015. Prevalencia y factores predisponentes a mastitis subclínica en establos lecheros de la provincia de Trujillo. Rev. CEDAMAZ. 5(1):12–23. Reyes Sánchez EA, Argüello Sánchez JS. 2015. Estudio comparativo entre los métodos diagnósticos para mastitis subclínicas, California Test y DRAMINSKI 4Q en vacas Jersey, Diriamba – Carazo, Agosto-Octubre, 2015. Managua, Nicaragua: Tesis Médico Veterinario, Universidad Nacional Agraria. Romero G, Díaz JR, Sabater JM, Pérez C. 2012. Evaluation of commercial probes for on-line electrical conductivity measurements during goat gland milking process. Sensors. 12:4493–4513. doi:10.3390/ s120404493. Ruegg PL. 2017. A 100-year review:Mastitis detection,management, and prevention. J. Dairy Sc. 100(12):10381–10397. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13023. Ruiz A, Ponce P, Gomes G, Mota R, Sampaio E, Lucena E, Benone S. 2011. Prevalencia de mastitis bovina subclínica y microorganismos asociados: comparación entre ordeño manual y mecánico, en Pernambuco, Brasil. Rev Salud Anim. 33(1):57–64. Ruíz-García LF, Sandoval-Monzón RS. 2018. Diagnóstico de mastitis subclínica de vacunos lecheros mediante el conteo de células somáticas empleando dos métodos diagnósticos. Rev Científ. 28(2):129–135. Salamanca-Carreño A, Tamasaukas R, Giraldo-Forero J, Quintero A, Hernández-Rodríguez M. 2018. Interacción entre factores ambientales y raciales sobre la prevalencia de hemotrópicos en hembras bovinas doble propósito en sabanas inundables araucanas, Colombia. Rev Científ FCV-LUZ. 28(1):52–62. Salamanca Carreño A, Vélez-Terranova M, Tamasaukas R, Jáuregui-Jiménez R, Parés-Casanova PM, Arias-Landazábal JN. 2023. Assessment of the prevalence of subclinical Mastitis in dual purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia: on-farm diagnostic tests comparison. Preprints.org. 2023040902:1–16. doi:10.20944/preprints202304.0902.v1. Saltijeral J, Cordova A, Ruiz G, Alonso U. 2004. Comparative study of electrical conductivity and CMT of quarter milk samples in dairy farm in Mexico. International Congress of the Society for Animal Hygiène. Saint-Malo. Sánchez-Herencia D, Mamani-Mango GD. 2022. Mastitis subclínica bovina y factores de riesgo ambientales en pequeños productores de ganado lechero criado en alta montaña. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 33(1):e20466. doi:10. 15381/rivep.v33i1.20466. Sanford C, Keefe G, Sanchez J, Dingwell R, Barkema H, Leslie K, Dohoo I. 2006. Test characteristics from latent-class models of the California Mastitis test. Prev Vet Med. 77(1–2):96–108. Santivañez-Ballón CS, Gómez-Quispe OE, Cárdenas-Villanueva LA, Escobedo-Enríquez MH, Bustinza-Cardenas RH, Peña-Sánchez J. 2013. Prevalencia y factores asociados a la mastitis subclínica bovina en los Andes peruanos. Vet Zootec. 7(2):92–104. http://vip.ucaldas.edu.co/ vetzootec/downloads/v7n2a07.pdf. Shahid M, Sabir N, Ahmed I, Khan RW, Irshad M, Rizwan M, Ahmed S. 2011. Diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in bovine using conventional methods and electronic detector. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci. 6(11):18–22. Tarabla H, Signorini M. 2020. Epidemiología diagnóstica (1ra ed.). (M. Signorini, Ed.) Santa Fe, Argentina: Universidad Nacional del Litoral, UNL. Tomasinsig L, De Conti G, Skerlavaj B, Piccinini R, Mazzilli M, D’Este F, Zanetti M. 2010. Broad-spectrum activity against bacterial mastitis pathogens and activation of mammary epithelial cells support a protective role of Neutrophil Cathelicidins in Bovine Mastitis. Infect Immunity. 78 (4):1781–1788. Trujillo CM, Gallego AF, Ramírez N, Palacio LG. 2011. Prevalencia de mastitis en siete hatos lecheros del oriente antioqueño. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 24(1):11–18. Wolter W, Castañeda V, Kloppert B, Zschöck M. 2004. La Mastitis Bovina. Instituto Estatal de Investigaciones de Hesse. Ying C, Yang C-B, Hsu J-T. 2004. Relationship of somatic cell count, physical, chemical and enzymatic properties to the bacterial standard plate count in different breeds of dairy goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(4):554–559. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00290-1. Zaninelli M, Rossi L, Tangorra FM, Costa A, Agazzi A, Savoini G. 2014. On-line monitoring of milk electrical conductivity by fuzzy logic technology to characterise health status in dairy goats. Ital J Anim Sc. 13(2):340–346. doi:10.4081/ijas.2014.3170.
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv	Atribución – No comercial – Sin Derivar
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución – No comercial – Sin Derivar http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv	599-607
dc.coverage.temporal.none.fl_str_mv	51 (1)
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv	Medicina veterinaria y zootecnia
dc.publisher.place.none.fl_str_mv	Villavicencio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
institution	Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/fd1ad9de-20c3-4c14-a08c-4baab437e0d3/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/a89baab6-cb3a-4c52-ad45-a41332109967/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/9042214f-f694-49ae-87e8-b14487afa04d/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/a4ba0b81-185b-4842-8d0c-4f4cbc1abf5a/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/32658226-e099-4b4c-9aeb-1a3617f8c148/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/96d3d6ff-83ac-46b5-b975-1379b43d82b5/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/6ee1bdfb-299c-4826-abe7-6b0f482064d6/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	e2a25922f2278e83338b4757c6b76f19 1842c1086ff627de66bf57b93f1ce6c9 3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45 0c4928d35eb01a530e96682d4388ebd4 6579531eb25fdbb655ef87969978d841 aebead0da94486bc2451be095b709116 7c110f9236b9c4e51eb47c0f63ccc056
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1811565654301474816
spelling	Salamanca Carreño, ArcesioVélez-Terranova, MauricioTamasaukas, RitaJáuregui-Jiménez, RaúlParés-Casanova, Pere M.Arias-Landazábal, José N.51 (1)2023-09-18T16:59:11Z2023-09-18T16:59:11Z2023-09-1309741844https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2023.2256829https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52706Salamanca-Carreño, Vélez-Terranova, Tamasaukas, Jáuregui-Jiménez, Parés-Casanova,Arias-Landazábal. 2023. Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 51 (1):599-607The assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis (SCM) in dairy farms is essential to evaluate the health status of mammary gland. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of SCM in dual purpose livestock systems in Arauca, Colombia, through the analysis the values found on-farm diagnostic California Mastitis Test (CMT) and Electric Conductivity (EC) test. Milk samples were taken from the individual mammary quarters of 481 cows. The cow level prevalence, per affected individual mammary quarters prevalence and the mammary quarter level prevalence were determined according to the values obtained for each test using two methods of analysis. An ANOVA was performed to determine the difference between prevalences. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used for intertest agreement, and an analysis of sensitivity and specificity. The cow level prevalence was similar between the tests (CMT = 31.4%; EC = 29.7%). The quarter-level prevalence was lower with EC (11.4% vs 14.3%) (p < 0.05). The agreement test between CMT (0) and EC ranged between 0.20 and 0.25. Despite the low agreement found between the tests, they can be useful in determining the health status of the mammary gland in the dual-purpose livestock systems of the Colombian Orinoquiahttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001022903https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-5906https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000009387asaca_65@yahoo.esarcesio.salamanca@campusucc.edu.cohttps://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=es&user=EqGLQZUAAAAJ599-607Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Cooperativa de ColombiaMedicina veterinaria y zootecniaVillavicenciohttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09712119.2023.2256829Journal of Applied Animal ResearchAcosta Moreno A, Mira Hernandez J, Posada Arias S. 2017. Tópicos en mastitis bovina: desde la etiología hasta algunas terapias alternativas. J Agricult Anim Sci. 6(1):42–58. doi:10.22507/jals.v6n1a4. Aguilar Aldrete A, Bañuelos Pineda J, Pimienta Barrios E, Aguilar Flores A, Torres Moran P. 2014. Prevalencia de mastitis subclínica en la Región de Ciénaga del Estado de Jalisco. Abanico Vet. 4(1):24–31. AL-Edany AA, Khudor M, AL-Mousawi K. 2012. Comparison of three indirect tests for the diagnosis of bovine subclinical mastitis caused by coagulase negative staphylococci with their susceptibility to seven antibiotics. Bas J Vet Res. 11(1):75–83. Andresen H. 2001. Mastitis: prevención y control. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 12(2):55– 64. Arauca. 2022. Clima: Arauca, Aeropuerto Santiago Pérez (En línea). https:// es.allmetsat.com/clima/venezuela.php?code=80099. Bachaya HA, Raza MA, Murtaza S, Akbar UR. 2011. Subclinical bovine mastitis in Muzaffar Garh district of Punjab (Pakistan). J Anim Plant Sci. 21 (1):16–19. Badiuzzaman M, Samad MA, Siddiki SH, Islam MT, Saha S. 2015. Subclinical mastitis in lactating cows: comparison of four screening tests and effect of animal factors on its occurrence. Bangl J Vet Med. 13(41):41–50. doi:10.3329/BJVM.V13I2.26627. Bedoya CC, Castañeda VH, Wolter W. 2007. Métodos de detección de la mastitis bovina. Rev. Electrón. Vet. 8(9):1–17. Calderon RA, Rodríguez RV, Arrieta BG, Mattar VS. 2011. Prevalence of mastitis in dual purpose cattle farms in Monteria (Colombia): etiology and antibacterial susceptibility. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 24(1):19–28. Castillo M, Suniaga J, Rojas G, Hernández JA. 2007. Prevalencia de mastitis subclinica en la zona alta del estdo Mérida. Estudio Preliminar Agricult Andina. 13:65–70. Cepero RO, Castillo JC, Salado RJ, Monteaguado JE. 2006. Detección de la mastitis subclínica mediante diferentes técnicas diagnósticas en unidades bovinas. Rev Produc Anim. 18(1):1–11. Deb R, Kumar A, Chakraborty S, Kumar Verma A, Tiwuari R, Dhama K, Kumar S. 2013. Trends in diagnosis and control of Bovine Mastitis: a review. Pakist J Biol Sci. 16(23):1653–1661. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2013.1653.1661. Draminski. 1987.Mastitis Detector. Electrónica en Agricultura.Manual de uso. ISO 9001 CE. https://www.draminski.es/agri/detectores-de-mastitis/. Elizalde EF, Signorini ML, Canavesio VR, Cuatrin A, Tarabla HD, Calvinho LF. 2019. Medición de la Conductividad Eléctrica en Leche como Método Diagnóstico de Mastitis Subclínica Bovina. Rev FAVE - Cienc Vet. 8 (1):15–28.8. Florio-Luis de Pineda J, Pineda M, Polanco M, Mendoza J, Díaz N, Florio-Luis G. 2015. Estrategias de prevención y control de mastitis como apoyo para preservar un rebaño bovino en los Llanos Centrales, Venezuela. Actas Iberoam Conserv Anim. 6:598–616. García-Sánchez F, Sánchez-Santana T, López-Vigoa O, Benítez- Álvarez MÁ. 2018. Prevalencia de mastitis subclínica y microorganismos asociados a esta. Pastos y Forrajes. 41(1):35–40. Gómez-Quispe OE, Santivañez-Ballón CS, Arauco-Villa F, Espezua-Flores OH, Manrique-Meza J. 2015. Criterios de Interpretación para California Mastitis Test en el Diagnóstico de Mastitis Subclínica en Bovinos. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 26(1):86–95. doi:10.15381/rivep.v26i1.10912. Guízar JI, Bedolla JL. 2008. Determinación de la prevalencia de mastitis bovina en el municipio de Tarímbaro, Michoacán, mediante la prueba de California. Rev Electrón Vet. 9(10):1–35. Hernández JM, Bedoya JL. 2008. Importancia del conteo de células somáticas en la calidad de la leche. Rev Elect Vet. 9(9):1–35. [IDEAM]. 2000. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. Información Aeronáutica. Climatología. Climatología. Precipitación media mensual y número de días: http://bart.ideam.gov. co/cliciu/arauca/precipitacion.htm. Ilie LI, Tudor L, Galis AM. 2010. The electrical conductivity of cattle milk and the possibility of mastitis diagnosis in Romania. Lucrări Ştiinłifice Medicină Veterinară. 43:220–227. InfoStat. 2020. InfoStat Versión 2020. Manual del Usuario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. https://www.infostat.com.ar/index. php?mod=page&id=46. Iraguha B, Hamudikuwanda H, Mushonga B, Kandiwa E, Mpatswenumugabo JP. 2017. Comparison of cow-side diagnostic tests for subclinical mastitis of dairy cows in Musanze district, Rwanda. J South Afric Vet Assoc. 88:1–6. doi:10.4102/jsava.v88i0.1464. Kamal RM, Bayoumi MA, Abd El Aal SF. 2014. Correlation between some direct and indirect tests for screen detection of subclinical mastitis. Int Food Res J. 21(3):1249–1254. Kaşikci G, Cetin O, Bingol BE, Gunduz MC. 2012. Relations between electrical conductivity, somatic cell count, California mastitis test and some quality parameters in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 36(1):49–55. doi:10.3906/vet-1103-4. Khatun M, Clark CE, Lyons NA, Thomson PC, Kerrisk KL, García SC. 2017. Early detection of clinical mastitis from electrical conductivity data in an automatic milking system. Anim Produc. Sc. 57(7):1226–1232. doi:10.1071/AN16707. Maldonado-Arias DF, Santos-Calderón CR, Quilapanta-Guamán AE, Mena- Miño LA. 2022. Diagnosis of subclinical Mastitis using three methods for control and treatment. Dom Cien. 8(1):773–790. doi:10.23857/dc. v8i1.2603. Manterola C, Otzen T. 2015. Valoración Clínica del Riesgo, Interpretación y Utilidad Práctica. Int J Morphol. 33(3):842–849. doi:10.4067/S0717- 95022015000300006. McHugh ML. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. (Zagreb). 22(3):276–282. Medina CM, Montaldo VH. 2003. El uso de la prueba de conductividad eléctrica y su relación con la prueba de California para mastitis. CNM. In: V Congreso Nacional de Control de Mastitis. México: Aguascalientes; p. 29–31. de mayo. Mellenberger R, Roth CJ. 2000. Hoja de Información de la Prueba de Mastitis California (CMT). https://bit.ly/43iegJq. Mendoza J, Vera Y, Peña L. 2017. Prevalencia de mastitis subclinica, microorganismos asociados y factores de riesgo identificdos en hatos de la provinvia de Pamplona, Norte de Santander. Rev Med Vet Zoot. 64 (2):11–24. doi:10.15446/rfmvz.v64n2.67209. Mera Andrade R, Muñoz Espinoza M, Artieda Rojas JR, Ortíz Tirado P, González Salas R, Vega Falcón V. 2017. Mastitis bovina y su repercusión en la calidad de la leche. Revi Elect Vet. 8(11):1–16. Mohammadsadegh M, Gharagoslu F, Bokaii S. 2007. Study the efficacy of an electric conductivity detector (Mas D Tec) in sub clinical mastitis diagnosis. Vet J Islam. 4:15–22. Murphy SC, Martin NH, Barbano DM, Wiedmann M. 2016. Influence ofraw milk quality on processed dairyproducts: how do raw milk quality testresults relate to product quality and yield? J Dairy Sc. 99:10128–10149. doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11172. Musser JM, Anderson JL, Caballero M, Amaya D, Maroto-Puga J. 1998. Evaluation of a hand-held electrical conductivity meter for detection of subclinical mastitis in cattle. Am J Vet Res. 59(9):1087–1091. NMC. 2017. National Mastitis Council, Inc. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Minnesota: Third printing. Pérez-Ruano M, Tarafa-Zambrana L. 2017. Evaluación del equipo Mas-D-Tec en el diagnóstico de campo de mastitis subclinica en el ganado bovino. Rev Salud Anim. 39(3):1–7. Petzer IM, Karzis J, Meyer IA, van der Schans TJ. 2013. A cost-benefit model comparing the California Milk Cell Test and Milk Electrical Resistance Test. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 80(1):1–14. doi:10.4102/ojvr.v80i1.538. Philpot W, Nickerson S. 2001. Winning the fight against Mastitis. I. 2. Westfalia Surge eds. Estados Unidos de América. Pinzón TA, Moreno FC, Rodríguez MG. 2009. Efectos de la mastitis subclínica en algunos hatos de la cuenca lechera del Alto Chicamocha (departamento de Boyacá). Rev Medic Vet. 17:23–35. Ponce P, Ribot A, Capdevila JZ, Villoch A. 2010. Manual aprendiendo de la leche PROCAL. San José de las Lajas. Cuba: CENSA, Minagricultura. [PROCOLOMBIA]. 2018. Aliado estrategico del sector lácteos. Mincomercio Industria y Turismo. https://bit.ly/3MpNIji. Ramírez Sánchez JM. 2015. Prevalencia y factores predisponentes a mastitis subclínica en establos lecheros de la provincia de Trujillo. Rev. CEDAMAZ. 5(1):12–23. Reyes Sánchez EA, Argüello Sánchez JS. 2015. Estudio comparativo entre los métodos diagnósticos para mastitis subclínicas, California Test y DRAMINSKI 4Q en vacas Jersey, Diriamba – Carazo, Agosto-Octubre, 2015. Managua, Nicaragua: Tesis Médico Veterinario, Universidad Nacional Agraria. Romero G, Díaz JR, Sabater JM, Pérez C. 2012. Evaluation of commercial probes for on-line electrical conductivity measurements during goat gland milking process. Sensors. 12:4493–4513. doi:10.3390/ s120404493. Ruegg PL. 2017. A 100-year review:Mastitis detection,management, and prevention. J. Dairy Sc. 100(12):10381–10397. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13023. Ruiz A, Ponce P, Gomes G, Mota R, Sampaio E, Lucena E, Benone S. 2011. Prevalencia de mastitis bovina subclínica y microorganismos asociados: comparación entre ordeño manual y mecánico, en Pernambuco, Brasil. Rev Salud Anim. 33(1):57–64. Ruíz-García LF, Sandoval-Monzón RS. 2018. Diagnóstico de mastitis subclínica de vacunos lecheros mediante el conteo de células somáticas empleando dos métodos diagnósticos. Rev Científ. 28(2):129–135. Salamanca-Carreño A, Tamasaukas R, Giraldo-Forero J, Quintero A, Hernández-Rodríguez M. 2018. Interacción entre factores ambientales y raciales sobre la prevalencia de hemotrópicos en hembras bovinas doble propósito en sabanas inundables araucanas, Colombia. Rev Científ FCV-LUZ. 28(1):52–62. Salamanca Carreño A, Vélez-Terranova M, Tamasaukas R, Jáuregui-Jiménez R, Parés-Casanova PM, Arias-Landazábal JN. 2023. Assessment of the prevalence of subclinical Mastitis in dual purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia: on-farm diagnostic tests comparison. Preprints.org. 2023040902:1–16. doi:10.20944/preprints202304.0902.v1. Saltijeral J, Cordova A, Ruiz G, Alonso U. 2004. Comparative study of electrical conductivity and CMT of quarter milk samples in dairy farm in Mexico. International Congress of the Society for Animal Hygiène. Saint-Malo. Sánchez-Herencia D, Mamani-Mango GD. 2022. Mastitis subclínica bovina y factores de riesgo ambientales en pequeños productores de ganado lechero criado en alta montaña. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 33(1):e20466. doi:10. 15381/rivep.v33i1.20466. Sanford C, Keefe G, Sanchez J, Dingwell R, Barkema H, Leslie K, Dohoo I. 2006. Test characteristics from latent-class models of the California Mastitis test. Prev Vet Med. 77(1–2):96–108. Santivañez-Ballón CS, Gómez-Quispe OE, Cárdenas-Villanueva LA, Escobedo-Enríquez MH, Bustinza-Cardenas RH, Peña-Sánchez J. 2013. Prevalencia y factores asociados a la mastitis subclínica bovina en los Andes peruanos. Vet Zootec. 7(2):92–104. http://vip.ucaldas.edu.co/ vetzootec/downloads/v7n2a07.pdf. Shahid M, Sabir N, Ahmed I, Khan RW, Irshad M, Rizwan M, Ahmed S. 2011. Diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in bovine using conventional methods and electronic detector. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci. 6(11):18–22. Tarabla H, Signorini M. 2020. Epidemiología diagnóstica (1ra ed.). (M. Signorini, Ed.) Santa Fe, Argentina: Universidad Nacional del Litoral, UNL. Tomasinsig L, De Conti G, Skerlavaj B, Piccinini R, Mazzilli M, D’Este F, Zanetti M. 2010. Broad-spectrum activity against bacterial mastitis pathogens and activation of mammary epithelial cells support a protective role of Neutrophil Cathelicidins in Bovine Mastitis. Infect Immunity. 78 (4):1781–1788. Trujillo CM, Gallego AF, Ramírez N, Palacio LG. 2011. Prevalencia de mastitis en siete hatos lecheros del oriente antioqueño. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 24(1):11–18. Wolter W, Castañeda V, Kloppert B, Zschöck M. 2004. La Mastitis Bovina. Instituto Estatal de Investigaciones de Hesse. Ying C, Yang C-B, Hsu J-T. 2004. Relationship of somatic cell count, physical, chemical and enzymatic properties to the bacterial standard plate count in different breeds of dairy goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(4):554–559. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00290-1. Zaninelli M, Rossi L, Tangorra FM, Costa A, Agazzi A, Savoini G. 2014. On-line monitoring of milk electrical conductivity by fuzzy logic technology to characterise health status in dairy goats. Ital J Anim Sc. 13(2):340–346. doi:10.4081/ijas.2014.3170.Conductividad eléctricaEstatus sanitarioNivel de prevalenciaGlándula mamariaPruebas en campoElectric conductivityhealth statuslevel prevalencemammary glandon-farm testsAssessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian OrinoquiaArtículos Científicoshttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAtribución – No comercial – Sin Derivarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2PublicationORIGINALAssessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis JAAR.pdfAssessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis JAAR.pdfapplication/pdf2224673https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/fd1ad9de-20c3-4c14-a08c-4baab437e0d3/downloade2a25922f2278e83338b4757c6b76f19MD51Licencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Mastitis subclinica pruebas.pdfLicencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Mastitis subclinica pruebas.pdfapplication/pdf201033https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/a89baab6-cb3a-4c52-ad45-a41332109967/download1842c1086ff627de66bf57b93f1ce6c9MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84334https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/9042214f-f694-49ae-87e8-b14487afa04d/download3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45MD53TEXTAssessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis JAAR.pdf.txtAssessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis JAAR.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain56940https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/a4ba0b81-185b-4842-8d0c-4f4cbc1abf5a/download0c4928d35eb01a530e96682d4388ebd4MD54Licencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Mastitis subclinica pruebas.pdf.txtLicencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Mastitis subclinica pruebas.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain6353https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/32658226-e099-4b4c-9aeb-1a3617f8c148/download6579531eb25fdbb655ef87969978d841MD56THUMBNAILAssessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis JAAR.pdf.jpgAssessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis JAAR.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg11114https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/96d3d6ff-83ac-46b5-b975-1379b43d82b5/downloadaebead0da94486bc2451be095b709116MD55Licencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Mastitis subclinica pruebas.pdf.jpgLicencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Mastitis subclinica pruebas.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13025https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/6ee1bdfb-299c-4826-abe7-6b0f482064d6/download7c110f9236b9c4e51eb47c0f63ccc056MD5720.500.12494/52706oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/527062024-08-20 16:24:13.109open.accesshttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.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

Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia

Publicaciones similares