La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha

La literatura en management ha revelado que hay una brecha conceptual, que deriva a la práctica empresarial, entre los conceptos de sostenibilidad organizacional (micro-dimensión) y la sostenibilidad ecológica o desarrollo sostenible (macro-dimensión). Este artículo de reflexión llama la atención so...

Full description

Autores:: Villa Castaño, Lida Esperanza
Dueñas Ocampo, Sebastián
Perdomo Ortiz, Jesús

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Repositorio:: Repositorio UCC

Idioma:

id	COOPER2_5a640496a56068ad24767db81debe366
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/34479
network_acronym_str	COOPER2
network_name_str	Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
title	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
spellingShingle	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha Alianzas intersectoriales Desarrollo sostenible Innovación social Negocios híbridos Sostenibilidad organizacional Intersectoral alliances Sustainable development Social innovation Hybrid businesses Organizational sustainability
title_short	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
title_full	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
title_fullStr	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
title_full_unstemmed	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
title_sort	La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Villa Castaño, Lida Esperanza Dueñas Ocampo, Sebastián Perdomo Ortiz, Jesús
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Villa Castaño, Lida Esperanza Dueñas Ocampo, Sebastián Perdomo Ortiz, Jesús
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Alianzas intersectoriales Desarrollo sostenible Innovación social Negocios híbridos Sostenibilidad organizacional
topic	Alianzas intersectoriales Desarrollo sostenible Innovación social Negocios híbridos Sostenibilidad organizacional Intersectoral alliances Sustainable development Social innovation Hybrid businesses Organizational sustainability
dc.subject.other.spa.fl_str_mv	Intersectoral alliances Sustainable development Social innovation Hybrid businesses Organizational sustainability
description	La literatura en management ha revelado que hay una brecha conceptual, que deriva a la práctica empresarial, entre los conceptos de sostenibilidad organizacional (micro-dimensión) y la sostenibilidad ecológica o desarrollo sostenible (macro-dimensión). Este artículo de reflexión llama la atención sobre la brecha identificada, mostrando algunos de los desafíos que esta separación demanda a las organizaciones. Se argumenta que las alianzas intersectoriales, la innovación social, y los negocios híbridos son formas organizacionales emergentes, basadas en la colaboración, que aportan al cierre de la brecha. La discusión sobre la distancia entre los enfoques de la sostenibilidad tipo valor compartido (inside-out) y los enfoques de sostenibilidad con foco en el bien común (outside-in), se ejemplifica con formas organizacionales emergentes en el contexto colombiano, con un énfasis en organizaciones con incidencia en la construcción de paz.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-06-08T20:49:45Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-06-08T20:49:45Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículos Científicos
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv	2248-6968
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/34479
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv	Dueñas-Ocampo, S., Perdomo-Ortiz, J. y Villa Castaño, L. E. (2021). La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha. Innovar, 31(80) 113-128. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/93668
identifier_str_mv	2248-6968 Dueñas-Ocampo, S., Perdomo-Ortiz, J. y Villa Castaño, L. E. (2021). La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha. Innovar, 31(80) 113-128. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/93668
url	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/34479
dc.relation.isversionof.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/93668
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Innovar
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Alberti, F. G., & Varón-Garrido, M. A. V. (2017). Can profit and sustaina - bility goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms. Journal of Business Strategy , 38 (1), 3-13. ht tps://doi.org/10.1108/ JB S -12-2015 - 0124 Alto Data Analytics ( ada ). (2018). Sustainability: Why ceo s need to be - come activists. Big data public opinion research reveals consumers expect ceos to lead as activists in sustainability . https://www. alto-analytics.com/en_US/sustainability-article/ Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Under - standing the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical un - derpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sus - tainability. Sustainability , 12 (3), 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su1203076 0 Artesanías de Colombia (16 de octubre 2013). Mejoramiento de la com - petitividad y productividad de la población artesana en la ciudad de Bogotá. http://artesaniasdecolombia.com.co/PortalAC/C_ nosotros/mejoramiento-de-la-competitividad-y-productividad- de-la-poblacion-artesana-en-la-ciudad-de-bogota_2802 Austin, J. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and busi - ness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 29 (supl.1), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S004 Austin, J. E. (2005). Alianzas sociales en América Latina: Enseñanzas ex - traídas de colaboraciones entre el sector privado y organizaciones de la sociedad civil . Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. h t t p s : // publications.iadb.org/es/alianzas-sociales-en-america-latina-en - senanzas-extraidas-de-colaboraciones-entre-el-sector-privado Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and com - mercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entre - preneurship Theory & Practice , 30 (1), 1-22. h t t p s : // d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .15 4 0 - 6 5 2 0 . 2 0 0 6 . 0 010 7. x Badurina--Durkin, J., Peric ́, M., & S ˇ ebrek-Kljaic ́, J. (2018). Hybrids by choice or by chance: Applying hybrid spectrum typology in Croa - tian tourism. Strategic Management , 23 (4), 3-14. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.5937/straman1804003d Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of na - ture. Organization Studies , 24 (1), 143-180. h t t p s : // d o i . or g /10 .1177/0170 8 4 0 6 03024 0 01341 Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J. and Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review , 10 (3),50 -55. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/in_search_of_the_hybrid_ideal Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organi - zing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals , 8 (1), 397-441. ht tps://doi.org/10.1080 /19416520.2014.893615 Bilodeau, A., Potvin, L., Galarneau, M., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). L’utilisation de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau dans la recherche in - terventionnelle en santé publique. Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique , 64 (supl. 2), S101. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j. respe.2015.07.014 B Lab. (2019). b est for the world 2019. https://bthechange.com/ bestfortheworld/home Borland, H., Ambrosini, V., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2016). Building theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management. Journal of Business Ethics , 135 , 293-307. h t t p s : // doi.org/10.10 07/s10551- 014 -2471- 6 Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corpo - rate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and prac - tice. International Journal of Management Reviews , 12 (1), 85-105. h t t p s : //d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .14 6 8 -2 37 0 . 2 0 0 9 . 0 0 2 7 5 . x Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corpo - rate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and prac - tice. International Journal of Management Reviews , 12 (1), 85-105. h t t p s : //d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .14 6 8 -2 37 0 . 2 0 0 9 . 0 0 2 7 5 . x Cieleme ̧cka, O., & Daigle, C. (2019). Posthuman sustainability: An ethos for our anthropocenic future. Theory, Culture & Society , 36 (7-8), 6 7- 87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419873710 Cieleme ̧cka, O., & Daigle, C. (2019). Posthuman sustainability: An ethos for our anthropocenic future. Theory, Culture & Society , 36 (7-8), 6 7- 87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419873710 Corporation 20/20 (2008) Corporation 20/20 Designing for social pur - pose. https://www.corporation2020.org/overview_goals.htm Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives , 23 (2), 44-56. h t t p s : // doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540 Dahlmann, F., Stubbs, W., Griggs, D., & Morrell, K. (2019). Corporate actors, the un Sustainable Development Goals and Earth System Governance: A research agenda. The Anthropocene Review , 6 (1-2), 167-176 . https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619848217 Díaz-Correa, J. E., & López-Navarro, M. A. (2018). Managing sustainable hybrid organisations: A case study in the agricultural sector. Sus - tainability , 10 (9), 3010. ht tps://doi.org/10. 3390/su10 093010 Dionisio, M., & de Vargas, E. R. (2020). Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review. International Business Review , 29 (2), 101641. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641 Dueñas-Ocampo, S., Perdomo-Ortiz, J., & Villa Castaño, L.E. (2014). El concepto de consumo socialmente responsable y su medición. Una revisión de la literatura. Estudios Gerenciales , 30 (132), 287- 300. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.01.022 Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable busi - ness: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment , 29 (2), 156 - 174 . h t t p s : //d oi . or g /10 .1177/10 8 6 026 615575176 European Commission ( ec ). (2013). Guide to social innovation . h t t p : // s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/20182/84453/Guide_ to_Social_Innovation.pdf Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review , 25 (3), 258-285. h t t p s : //d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ b e e r .12115 Felber, C. (2015). Change Everything . Zed Books. Folke, C., Österblom, H., Jouffray, J. B., Lambin, E. F., Adger, W. N., Scheffer, M., ... & de Zeeuw, A. (2019). Transnational corpora - tions and the challenge of biosphere stewardship. Nature Eco - logy & Evolution , 3 (10), 1396-1403. ht tps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41559-019-0978-z Franco, N., Dueñas-Ocampo, S., & Castillo, M. (2016). Alqueria: more than just a glass of milk. Havard Business Publishing Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics , 53 (1-2), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34 Goyal, S., Sergi, B.S. & Jaiswal, M. (2015). How to design and imple - ment social business models for base-of-the-pyramid (BoP) mar - kets? The European Journal of Development Research , 27 (5), 850- 8 6 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.71 Gray, B., & Stites, J. P. (2013). “Sustainability through partnerships. Ca - pitalizing on collaboration”. Network for business sustainability, case study , 24 , 1-110. http://www.wageningenportals.nl/sites/ default/files/resource/nbs-systematic-review-partnerships.pdf Gutiérrez, R., & Lobo, I. D. (2006). Caminos que la filantropía puede abrir. Sociedad y Economía , 10 , 47-67. https://www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=99616145002 Hammond, A. L., Kramer, Tran, J. T., W. J., Katz, R. S., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. World Resources Institute. www.wri.org/ publication/the-next-4-billion Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet . Earthscan. Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2017). Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environmental Change , 42 , 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008 Kagan, C., & Burton, M. H. (2018). Putting the ‘social’ into sustaina - bility science. En W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research (pp. 285-298). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.10 07/978 -3-319 - 630 07- 6 _17 Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015a). Cross-sector collaboration, institutional gaps, and fragility: The role of social innovation partnerships in a conflict-affected region. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing , 34 (2), 287-303. ht tps: //doi.org/10.1509/jppm.14.157 Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015b). Partnerships for peace and development in fragile states: Identifying missing links. The Academy of Man - agement Perspectives , 29 (4), 422-437. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amp.2013.0122 Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2016). Hybrid business models for peace and reconciliation. Business Horizons , 59 (5), 503-524. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.014 Kourula, A., Pisani, N., & Kolk, A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and in - clusive development: Highlights from international business and management research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustain - ability , 24 , 14-18. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust .2017.01.003 Lohas Beans. (2020). Lohas Beans. https://lohasbeans.com/ Latapí-Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsi - bility , 4 (1), 1. ht tps://doi.org/10.1186/s 40991- 018 - 0 039 -y Mancini, M. S., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., Lin, D., Bastianoni, S., Wacker - nagel, M., & Marchettini, N. (2016). Ecological footprint: Refi - ning the carbon footprint calculation. Ecological Indicators , 61 (2), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040 “Manos amigas buscan el progreso del campo”. (31 de octubre de 2019). El Tiempo . https://www.eltiempo.com/mas-contenido/ manos-amigas-buscan-el-progreso-del-campo-428820 Miklian, J., & Schouten, P. (2019). Broadening ‘business’, widening ‘peace’: A new research agenda on business and peace-building. Conflict, Security and Development , 19 (1) , 1-13. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14678802. 2019.1561612 Mishra, S. (2019). Evolution of corporate social responsibility: two sets of explanation. Social Responsibility Journal , 16 (8), 1341-1356. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2019-0135 Mirvis, P., Baltazar, M. E., Googins, B., & Albareda, L. (2016). Corpo - rate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. Journal of Business Research , 69 (11), 5014-5021. h t t p s : // doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.073 Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corpo - rate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization & Environment , 27 (2), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614526413 Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford Said Business School. https://www.youngfoundation.org/publi - cations/social-innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can- be-accelerated O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., ... & Solecki, W. (2017). The roads ahead: narra - tives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change , 42 , 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 O’Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015). Transforming consumption: From decou - pling, to behavior change, to system changes for sustainable con - sumption. Annual Review of Environment and Resources , 40 , 233- 259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224 Parra, C. (2013). Social sustainability: A competing concept to social innovation? En F. Moulaert, D. McCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Ha - mdouch (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 142-154). Edward Elgar Publishing Patagonia. (2020). How we work with factories, farms and mills: Pro - moting fair labor practices and safe working conditions throug - hout Patagonia’s supply chain. http://www.patagonia.com/cor - porate-responsibility.html Parra, C. (2013). Social sustainability: a competing concept to social in - novation? En F. Moulaert (Ed.), The International Handbook on So - cial Innovation: collective action, social learning and transdiscipli - nary research . (pp. 142-152) Edward Elgar Publishing. Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, pro - fitably. Harvard Business Review , 80 (9), 48-57. h t t p s : // h b r . org/2002/09/serving-the-worlds-poor-profitably Roome, N. J. (2013). Sustainable development: Social innovation at the interface of business, society, and ecology. En T. Os - burg & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Social Innovation. Solutions for a sustainable future (pp. 299-308). Springer. h t t p : // d o i . org/10.10 07/978 -3- 642-36540 -9_ 27 Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2014). La nueva gobernanza política y las colaboraciones intersectoriales para el desarrollo sostenible. In - novar , 24 (53), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar. v24n53.43945 Scott, L., & McGill, A. (2018). From promise to reality: Does business re - ally care about the sdgs? Price Waterhouse Coopers. https://www. pwc.com/gx/en/sustainability/SDG/sdg-reporting-2018.pdf Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the sdgs : The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustai - nable Development , 24 (6), 371-382. ht tps://doi.org/10.10 02/ s d.1623 "El café de la paz: la experiencia de desmovilizados sembrando café". (6 de noviembre de 2019). Semana. https://www.semana.com/ nacion/articulo/el-cafe-de-la-paz-la-experiencia-de-desmovili - zados-sembrando-cafe/619264 Sistema B (2020). La historia del movimiento B en Latinoamerica y el mundo. https://www.sistemab.org/sobre/ Sun, J., Wu, S., & Yang, K. (2018). An ecosystemic framework for busi - ness sustainability. Business Horizons , 61 (1), 59-72. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.006 The Body Shop. (2020). Enrich not exploit™ targets. h t t p s : // www.thebodyshop.com/en-us/about-us/our-commitment/ corporate-social-responsibility Triana-Ángel, N., & Ariza-Aya, M. (2019). Juventud ganadera, motor para el cambio: alianzas estratégicas con la empresa privada ( ciat / ccafs -Alquería): Nacimiento, motivaciones y objetivos de la inicia - tiva Herederos de Tradición llevada a cabo por Alquería dentro de sus programas de Formación Campesina . ccafs Info Note. cgiar Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Se - curity ( ccafs ). https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/107074 Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhan - cing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics , 135 (1), 1-17. ht tps://doi.org/10.10 07/s10551- 015-2756 - 4 Unilever. (2020). Making sustainable living commonplace for 8 bi - llion people. https://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/our- approach-to-a-brighter-future United Nations ( un ). (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. un . h t t p s : // s d g s . un.org/2030agenda Van der Waal, J. W., & Thijssens, T. (2020). Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production , 252 , 119625. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119625 Van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). En - hancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics , 135 (1), 1-17. ht tps://doi.org/10.10 07/ s10551-015-2756-4 Waddock, S. (1991), A typology of social partnership organiza - tions. Administration & Society , 22 (4), 480-515. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.1177/0 0953997910220 0405 Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boun - daries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies , (50) 2, 307-336. h t t p s : // d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .14 6 7- 6 4 8 6 . 2 012 . 010 7 3 . x
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv	Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	113 - 128
dc.coverage.temporal.spa.fl_str_mv	31/80
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables, Administración de Empresas, Bogotá Director y editor general/Editor in Chief: Dr. Víctor Mauricio Castañeda Rodríguez
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Administración de Empresas
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá
institution	Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/53672d2f-293f-4afd-ae03-419a399ee54b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1811565654177742848
spelling	Villa Castaño, Lida EsperanzaDueñas Ocampo, SebastiánPerdomo Ortiz, Jesús31/802021-06-08T20:49:45Z2021-06-08T20:49:45Z2021-04-152248-6968https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/34479Dueñas-Ocampo, S., Perdomo-Ortiz, J. y Villa Castaño, L. E. (2021). La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha. Innovar, 31(80) 113-128. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/93668La literatura en management ha revelado que hay una brecha conceptual, que deriva a la práctica empresarial, entre los conceptos de sostenibilidad organizacional (micro-dimensión) y la sostenibilidad ecológica o desarrollo sostenible (macro-dimensión). Este artículo de reflexión llama la atención sobre la brecha identificada, mostrando algunos de los desafíos que esta separación demanda a las organizaciones. Se argumenta que las alianzas intersectoriales, la innovación social, y los negocios híbridos son formas organizacionales emergentes, basadas en la colaboración, que aportan al cierre de la brecha. La discusión sobre la distancia entre los enfoques de la sostenibilidad tipo valor compartido (inside-out) y los enfoques de sostenibilidad con foco en el bien común (outside-in), se ejemplifica con formas organizacionales emergentes en el contexto colombiano, con un énfasis en organizaciones con incidencia en la construcción de paz.Management literature has revealed the existing gap between the concepts of organizational sustainability (micro-dimension) and ecological sustainability or sustainable development (macro-dimension) in the business world. Hence, this article draws attention to the identified breach, showing some of the challenges that this separation establishes for organizations. It is argued that intersectoral alliances, social innovation, and hybrid businesses are emerging organizational forms based on collaboration that could contribute to bridging the gap. The debate around the distance between shared-value sustainability approaches (inside-out) and sustainability perspectives focused on the common good (outside-in) is represented through emerging organizational forms in the Colombian context, with a particular emphasis on organizations with a direct impact on peacebuilding.http://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000644463https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-3870lida.villacas@campusucc.edu.cosebastian.duenas@javeriana.edu.cojesush.perdomo@javeriana.edu.cohttps://scholar.google.es/citations?hl=es&user=oS6-E3MAAAAJ113 - 128Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables, Administración de Empresas, BogotáDirector y editor general/Editor in Chief: Dr. Víctor Mauricio Castañeda RodríguezAdministración de EmpresasBogotáhttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/93668InnovarAlberti, F. G., & Varón-Garrido, M. A. V. (2017). Can profit and sustaina - bility goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms. Journal of Business Strategy , 38 (1), 3-13. ht tps://doi.org/10.1108/ JB S -12-2015 - 0124Alto Data Analytics ( ada ). (2018). Sustainability: Why ceo s need to be - come activists. Big data public opinion research reveals consumers expect ceos to lead as activists in sustainability . https://www. alto-analytics.com/en_US/sustainability-article/Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Under - standing the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical un - derpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sus - tainability. Sustainability , 12 (3), 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su1203076 0Artesanías de Colombia (16 de octubre 2013). Mejoramiento de la com - petitividad y productividad de la población artesana en la ciudad de Bogotá. http://artesaniasdecolombia.com.co/PortalAC/C_ nosotros/mejoramiento-de-la-competitividad-y-productividad- de-la-poblacion-artesana-en-la-ciudad-de-bogota_2802Austin, J. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and busi - ness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 29 (supl.1), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S004Austin, J. E. (2005). Alianzas sociales en América Latina: Enseñanzas ex - traídas de colaboraciones entre el sector privado y organizaciones de la sociedad civil . Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. h t t p s : // publications.iadb.org/es/alianzas-sociales-en-america-latina-en - senanzas-extraidas-de-colaboraciones-entre-el-sector-privadoAustin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and com - mercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entre - preneurship Theory & Practice , 30 (1), 1-22. h t t p s : // d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .15 4 0 - 6 5 2 0 . 2 0 0 6 . 0 010 7. xBadurina--Durkin, J., Peric ́, M., & S ˇ ebrek-Kljaic ́, J. (2018). Hybrids by choice or by chance: Applying hybrid spectrum typology in Croa - tian tourism. Strategic Management , 23 (4), 3-14. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.5937/straman1804003dBanerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of na - ture. Organization Studies , 24 (1), 143-180. h t t p s : // d o i . or g /10 .1177/0170 8 4 0 6 03024 0 01341Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J. and Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review , 10 (3),50 -55. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/in_search_of_the_hybrid_idealBattilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organi - zing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals , 8 (1), 397-441. ht tps://doi.org/10.1080 /19416520.2014.893615Bilodeau, A., Potvin, L., Galarneau, M., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). L’utilisation de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau dans la recherche in - terventionnelle en santé publique. Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique , 64 (supl. 2), S101. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j. respe.2015.07.014B Lab. (2019). b est for the world 2019. https://bthechange.com/ bestfortheworld/homeBorland, H., Ambrosini, V., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2016). Building theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management. Journal of Business Ethics , 135 , 293-307. h t t p s : // doi.org/10.10 07/s10551- 014 -2471- 6Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corpo - rate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and prac - tice. International Journal of Management Reviews , 12 (1), 85-105. h t t p s : //d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .14 6 8 -2 37 0 . 2 0 0 9 . 0 0 2 7 5 . xCarroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corpo - rate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and prac - tice. International Journal of Management Reviews , 12 (1), 85-105. h t t p s : //d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .14 6 8 -2 37 0 . 2 0 0 9 . 0 0 2 7 5 . xCieleme ̧cka, O., & Daigle, C. (2019). Posthuman sustainability: An ethos for our anthropocenic future. Theory, Culture & Society , 36 (7-8), 6 7- 87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419873710Cieleme ̧cka, O., & Daigle, C. (2019). Posthuman sustainability: An ethos for our anthropocenic future. Theory, Culture & Society , 36 (7-8), 6 7- 87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419873710Corporation 20/20 (2008) Corporation 20/20 Designing for social pur - pose. https://www.corporation2020.org/overview_goals.htmDevinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives , 23 (2), 44-56. h t t p s : // doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540Dahlmann, F., Stubbs, W., Griggs, D., & Morrell, K. (2019). Corporate actors, the un Sustainable Development Goals and Earth System Governance: A research agenda. The Anthropocene Review , 6 (1-2), 167-176 . https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619848217Díaz-Correa, J. E., & López-Navarro, M. A. (2018). Managing sustainable hybrid organisations: A case study in the agricultural sector. Sus - tainability , 10 (9), 3010. ht tps://doi.org/10. 3390/su10 093010Dionisio, M., & de Vargas, E. R. (2020). Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review. International Business Review , 29 (2), 101641. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641Dueñas-Ocampo, S., Perdomo-Ortiz, J., & Villa Castaño, L.E. (2014). El concepto de consumo socialmente responsable y su medición. Una revisión de la literatura. Estudios Gerenciales , 30 (132), 287- 300. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.01.022Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable busi - ness: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment , 29 (2), 156 - 174 . h t t p s : //d oi . or g /10 .1177/10 8 6 026 615575176European Commission ( ec ). (2013). Guide to social innovation . h t t p : // s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/20182/84453/Guide_ to_Social_Innovation.pdfFrynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review , 25 (3), 258-285. h t t p s : //d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ b e e r .12115Felber, C. (2015). Change Everything . Zed Books.Folke, C., Österblom, H., Jouffray, J. B., Lambin, E. F., Adger, W. N., Scheffer, M., ... & de Zeeuw, A. (2019). Transnational corpora - tions and the challenge of biosphere stewardship. Nature Eco - logy & Evolution , 3 (10), 1396-1403. ht tps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41559-019-0978-zFranco, N., Dueñas-Ocampo, S., & Castillo, M. (2016). Alqueria: more than just a glass of milk. Havard Business PublishingGarriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics , 53 (1-2), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34Goyal, S., Sergi, B.S. & Jaiswal, M. (2015). How to design and imple - ment social business models for base-of-the-pyramid (BoP) mar - kets? The European Journal of Development Research , 27 (5), 850- 8 6 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.71Gray, B., & Stites, J. P. (2013). “Sustainability through partnerships. Ca - pitalizing on collaboration”. Network for business sustainability, case study , 24 , 1-110. http://www.wageningenportals.nl/sites/ default/files/resource/nbs-systematic-review-partnerships.pdfGutiérrez, R., & Lobo, I. D. (2006). Caminos que la filantropía puede abrir. Sociedad y Economía , 10 , 47-67. https://www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=99616145002Hammond, A. L., Kramer, Tran, J. T., W. J., Katz, R. S., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. World Resources Institute. www.wri.org/ publication/the-next-4-billionJackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet . Earthscan.Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2017). Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environmental Change , 42 , 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008Kagan, C., & Burton, M. H. (2018). Putting the ‘social’ into sustaina - bility science. En W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research (pp. 285-298). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.10 07/978 -3-319 - 630 07- 6 _17Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015a). Cross-sector collaboration, institutional gaps, and fragility: The role of social innovation partnerships in a conflict-affected region. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing , 34 (2), 287-303. ht tps: //doi.org/10.1509/jppm.14.157Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015b). Partnerships for peace and development in fragile states: Identifying missing links. The Academy of Man - agement Perspectives , 29 (4), 422-437. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amp.2013.0122Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2016). Hybrid business models for peace and reconciliation. Business Horizons , 59 (5), 503-524. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.014Kourula, A., Pisani, N., & Kolk, A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and in - clusive development: Highlights from international business and management research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustain - ability , 24 , 14-18. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust .2017.01.003Lohas Beans. (2020). Lohas Beans. https://lohasbeans.com/Latapí-Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsi - bility , 4 (1), 1. ht tps://doi.org/10.1186/s 40991- 018 - 0 039 -yMancini, M. S., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., Lin, D., Bastianoni, S., Wacker - nagel, M., & Marchettini, N. (2016). Ecological footprint: Refi - ning the carbon footprint calculation. Ecological Indicators , 61 (2), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040“Manos amigas buscan el progreso del campo”. (31 de octubre de 2019). El Tiempo . https://www.eltiempo.com/mas-contenido/ manos-amigas-buscan-el-progreso-del-campo-428820Miklian, J., & Schouten, P. (2019). Broadening ‘business’, widening ‘peace’: A new research agenda on business and peace-building. Conflict, Security and Development , 19 (1) , 1-13. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14678802. 2019.1561612Mishra, S. (2019). Evolution of corporate social responsibility: two sets of explanation. Social Responsibility Journal , 16 (8), 1341-1356. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2019-0135Mirvis, P., Baltazar, M. E., Googins, B., & Albareda, L. (2016). Corpo - rate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. Journal of Business Research , 69 (11), 5014-5021. h t t p s : // doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.073Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corpo - rate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization & Environment , 27 (2), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614526413Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford Said Business School. https://www.youngfoundation.org/publi - cations/social-innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can- be-acceleratedO’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., ... & Solecki, W. (2017). The roads ahead: narra - tives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change , 42 , 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004O’Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015). Transforming consumption: From decou - pling, to behavior change, to system changes for sustainable con - sumption. Annual Review of Environment and Resources , 40 , 233- 259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224Parra, C. (2013). Social sustainability: A competing concept to social innovation? En F. Moulaert, D. McCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Ha - mdouch (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 142-154). Edward Elgar PublishingPatagonia. (2020). How we work with factories, farms and mills: Pro - moting fair labor practices and safe working conditions throug - hout Patagonia’s supply chain. http://www.patagonia.com/cor - porate-responsibility.htmlParra, C. (2013). Social sustainability: a competing concept to social in - novation? En F. Moulaert (Ed.), The International Handbook on So - cial Innovation: collective action, social learning and transdiscipli - nary research . (pp. 142-152) Edward Elgar Publishing.Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, pro - fitably. Harvard Business Review , 80 (9), 48-57. h t t p s : // h b r . org/2002/09/serving-the-worlds-poor-profitablyRoome, N. J. (2013). Sustainable development: Social innovation at the interface of business, society, and ecology. En T. Os - burg & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Social Innovation. Solutions for a sustainable future (pp. 299-308). Springer. h t t p : // d o i . org/10.10 07/978 -3- 642-36540 -9_ 27Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2014). La nueva gobernanza política y las colaboraciones intersectoriales para el desarrollo sostenible. In - novar , 24 (53), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar. v24n53.43945Scott, L., & McGill, A. (2018). From promise to reality: Does business re - ally care about the sdgs? Price Waterhouse Coopers. https://www. pwc.com/gx/en/sustainability/SDG/sdg-reporting-2018.pdfScheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the sdgs : The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustai - nable Development , 24 (6), 371-382. ht tps://doi.org/10.10 02/ s d.1623"El café de la paz: la experiencia de desmovilizados sembrando café". (6 de noviembre de 2019). Semana. https://www.semana.com/ nacion/articulo/el-cafe-de-la-paz-la-experiencia-de-desmovili - zados-sembrando-cafe/619264Sistema B (2020). La historia del movimiento B en Latinoamerica y el mundo. https://www.sistemab.org/sobre/Sun, J., Wu, S., & Yang, K. (2018). An ecosystemic framework for busi - ness sustainability. Business Horizons , 61 (1), 59-72. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.006The Body Shop. (2020). Enrich not exploit™ targets. h t t p s : // www.thebodyshop.com/en-us/about-us/our-commitment/ corporate-social-responsibilityTriana-Ángel, N., & Ariza-Aya, M. (2019). Juventud ganadera, motor para el cambio: alianzas estratégicas con la empresa privada ( ciat / ccafs -Alquería): Nacimiento, motivaciones y objetivos de la inicia - tiva Herederos de Tradición llevada a cabo por Alquería dentro de sus programas de Formación Campesina . ccafs Info Note. cgiar Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Se - curity ( ccafs ). https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/107074Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhan - cing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics , 135 (1), 1-17. ht tps://doi.org/10.10 07/s10551- 015-2756 - 4Unilever. (2020). Making sustainable living commonplace for 8 bi - llion people. https://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/our- approach-to-a-brighter-futureUnited Nations ( un ). (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. un . h t t p s : // s d g s . un.org/2030agendaVan der Waal, J. W., & Thijssens, T. (2020). Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production , 252 , 119625. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119625Van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). En - hancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics , 135 (1), 1-17. ht tps://doi.org/10.10 07/ s10551-015-2756-4Waddock, S. (1991), A typology of social partnership organiza - tions. Administration & Society , 22 (4), 480-515. h t t p s : // d o i . org/10.1177/0 0953997910220 0405Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boun - daries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies , (50) 2, 307-336. h t t p s : // d o i . o r g / 10 .1111/ j .14 6 7- 6 4 8 6 . 2 012 . 010 7 3 . xAlianzas intersectorialesDesarrollo sostenibleInnovación socialNegocios híbridosSostenibilidad organizacionalIntersectoral alliancesSustainable developmentSocial innovationHybrid businessesOrganizational sustainabilityLa separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brechaArtículos Científicoshttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAtribución – No comercial – Compartir igualinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2PublicationLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84334https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/53672d2f-293f-4afd-ae03-419a399ee54b/download3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45MD5220.500.12494/34479oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/344792024-08-10 17:59:32.675metadata.onlyhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.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

La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha

Publicaciones similares