Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica

Introduction: The objective of the present investigation was to carry out content validity based on expert judgment of a measurement instrument that investigates 4 dimensions: physical reactions, consequences, disturbances and coping methods of students of medicine before the practice of anatomical...

Full description

Autores:
Bernal García, Martha Inés
Salamanca Jiménez, David Ricardo
Perez Gutierrez, Norton
Quemba Mesa, Mónica Paola
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UCC
Idioma:
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/41441
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.004
http://www.revistainfectio.org/index.php/infectio/article/view/783/823
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41441
Palabra clave:
Anatomy
Content validity
Dissection
Experts judgment
Fleiss kappa coefficient
Medical education
Rights
closedAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
id COOPER2_4cbc339adcfd9e313641a7be1fbfcb13
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/41441
network_acronym_str COOPER2
network_name_str Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
spelling Bernal García, Martha InésSalamanca Jiménez, David RicardoPerez Gutierrez, NortonQuemba Mesa, Mónica Paola2021-12-16T22:15:31Z2021-12-16T22:15:31Z2018https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.004http://www.revistainfectio.org/index.php/infectio/article/view/783/82315751813https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41441Bernal MI,Salamanca DR,PEREZ N,Quemba MP. Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica. Educ. Med. 2018. p. 1-8. .Introduction: The objective of the present investigation was to carry out content validity based on expert judgment of a measurement instrument that investigates 4 dimensions: physical reactions, consequences, disturbances and coping methods of students of medicine before the practice of anatomical dissection. Material and method: Psychometric study of content validity, in which 9 experts participated who evaluated each item based on the characteristics of sufficiency, clarity, coherence, relevance and pertinence, as well as estimates related to the congruence of the items, breadth of content, writing, clarity and relevance of the original instrument. The qualitative observations of the experts were taken into account. The degree of agreement between experts was determined with the Fleiss kappa coefficient. A preliminary test was applied to measure the degree of comprehensibility. Results: Globally, almost perfect strength of agreement was obtained in each dimension, and in pairs of experts, between moderate and almost perfect. For the characteristics, the relevance was the highest (0.8443) and in the statistical significance, the sufficiency (p =.0268). The structure of the instrument was adjusted, without affecting the content validity. Of the 39 original items, 16 items were eliminated, and 22 items were retained, of which 6 were corrected in writing. The degree of comprehensibility was of high rank for the new version of the instrument. Conclusion: The validated instrument can be explored and applied to favor the comparison of populations of different faculties in this and other countries that speak the same Spanish language. © 2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U.0000-0002-6666-0795norton.perezg@campusucc.edu.co8-1Fundacion Privada Educacion MedicaAnatomyContent validityDissectionExperts judgmentFleiss kappa coefficientMedical educationValidez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómicaArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionEducacion Medicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbPublication20.500.12494/41441oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/414412024-08-20 16:20:51.679metadata.onlyhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
title Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
spellingShingle Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
Anatomy
Content validity
Dissection
Experts judgment
Fleiss kappa coefficient
Medical education
title_short Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
title_full Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
title_fullStr Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
title_full_unstemmed Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
title_sort Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Bernal García, Martha Inés
Salamanca Jiménez, David Ricardo
Perez Gutierrez, Norton
Quemba Mesa, Mónica Paola
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Bernal García, Martha Inés
Salamanca Jiménez, David Ricardo
Perez Gutierrez, Norton
Quemba Mesa, Mónica Paola
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Anatomy
Content validity
Dissection
Experts judgment
Fleiss kappa coefficient
Medical education
topic Anatomy
Content validity
Dissection
Experts judgment
Fleiss kappa coefficient
Medical education
description Introduction: The objective of the present investigation was to carry out content validity based on expert judgment of a measurement instrument that investigates 4 dimensions: physical reactions, consequences, disturbances and coping methods of students of medicine before the practice of anatomical dissection. Material and method: Psychometric study of content validity, in which 9 experts participated who evaluated each item based on the characteristics of sufficiency, clarity, coherence, relevance and pertinence, as well as estimates related to the congruence of the items, breadth of content, writing, clarity and relevance of the original instrument. The qualitative observations of the experts were taken into account. The degree of agreement between experts was determined with the Fleiss kappa coefficient. A preliminary test was applied to measure the degree of comprehensibility. Results: Globally, almost perfect strength of agreement was obtained in each dimension, and in pairs of experts, between moderate and almost perfect. For the characteristics, the relevance was the highest (0.8443) and in the statistical significance, the sufficiency (p =.0268). The structure of the instrument was adjusted, without affecting the content validity. Of the 39 original items, 16 items were eliminated, and 22 items were retained, of which 6 were corrected in writing. The degree of comprehensibility was of high rank for the new version of the instrument. Conclusion: The validated instrument can be explored and applied to favor the comparison of populations of different faculties in this and other countries that speak the same Spanish language. © 2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-16T22:15:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-16T22:15:31Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.004
http://www.revistainfectio.org/index.php/infectio/article/view/783/823
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 15751813
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41441
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Bernal MI,Salamanca DR,PEREZ N,Quemba MP. Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica. Educ. Med. 2018. p. 1-8. .
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.004
http://www.revistainfectio.org/index.php/infectio/article/view/783/823
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41441
identifier_str_mv 15751813
Bernal MI,Salamanca DR,PEREZ N,Quemba MP. Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos de un instrumento para medir percepciones físico-emocionales en la práctica de disección anatómica. Educ. Med. 2018. p. 1-8. .
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Educacion Medica
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
eu_rights_str_mv closedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 8-1
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Fundacion Privada Educacion Medica
institution Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1814247087843311616