Cultural Rights and Policies in the Department of Santander, Colombia, 2008-2011

Introduction: In recent years, we have witnessed a process of institutionalization and formalization of culture in the country through the adoption of cultural rights, consolidation of cultural legislation, and creation of the Ministry and secretaries of culture, among other factors. At the same tim...

Full description

Autores:
Otero-Torres, Eduardo
Rodríguez- Hernandez, Hernán
Rodríguez-Duarte, María Alejandra
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UCC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/9060
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/1526
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/9060
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2016 Dixi
Description
Summary:Introduction: In recent years, we have witnessed a process of institutionalization and formalization of culture in the country through the adoption of cultural rights, consolidation of cultural legislation, and creation of the Ministry and secretaries of culture, among other factors. At the same time, we have witnessed major transformations at the level of discourse, such as the notions of cultural development and cultural pluralism that are centrally promoted by unesco. Methodology: To describe the national and international context of policies on culture and examine the general framework of cultural policies in the department of Santander (Colombia), detailing the various programs that form the core cultural strategies and analyzing indicators of each strategy. Result: We have demonstrated changes in the filds of communications and the economy, where culture has begun to take on a central role in gdp, though it is yet to have signifiant importance in the policies of our governments. Conclusions: Th diffilty of grasping the cultural dimension—which vacillates between the artistic and anthropological spheres—generates imprecision in programs and diffilty in the conception ofthe link between culture, development, and democracy.