Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis
Objective: The treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis is toxic, has contraindications, and a high cost. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Methods: Effectiveness was the propor...
- Autores:
-
Cardona Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
López-Carvajal L.
Tamayo Plata M.P.
Vélez I.D.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UCC
- Idioma:
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/41760
- Palabra clave:
- Antimony sodium gluconate
Colombia
cost-effectiveness analysis
cutaneous leishmaniasis
thermotherapy
- Rights
- closedAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
id |
COOPER2_0da927521d3667d5fd9214d099b1afa9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/41760 |
network_acronym_str |
COOPER2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UCC |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cardona Arias, Jaiberth AntonioLópez-Carvajal L.Tamayo Plata M.P.Vélez I.D.2021-12-16T22:15:46Z2021-12-16T22:15:46Z2017https://doi.org/10.15665/re.v14il1.67517565383https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41760Cardona JA,López L,Tamayo MP,Vélez ID. Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Evid.-Based Med. 2017. 10. (2):p. 81-90. .Objective: The treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis is toxic, has contraindications, and a high cost. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Methods: Effectiveness was the proportion of healing and safety with the adverse effects; these parameters were estimated from a controlled clinical trial and a meta-analysis. A standard costing was conducted. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. The uncertainty regarding effectiveness, safety, and costs was determined through sensitivity analyses. Results: The total costs were $66,807 with Glucantime and $14,079 with thermotherapy. The therapeutic effectiveness rates were 64.2% for thermotherapy and 85.1% for Glucantime. The average cost-effectiveness ratios ranged between $721 and $1275 for Glucantime and between $187 and $390 for thermotherapy. Based on the meta-analysis, thermotherapy may be a dominant strategy. Conclusion: The excellent cost-effectiveness ratio of thermotherapy shows the relevance of its inclusion in guidelines for the treatment. © 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd0000-0002-7101-929Xjaiberth.cardona@campusucc.edu.co90-81Blackwell PublishingAntimony sodium gluconateColombiacost-effectiveness analysiscutaneous leishmaniasisthermotherapyCost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasisArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionJournal Of Evidence-Based Medicineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbPublication20.500.12494/41760oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/417602024-08-20 16:23:22.808metadata.onlyhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis |
spellingShingle |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis Antimony sodium gluconate Colombia cost-effectiveness analysis cutaneous leishmaniasis thermotherapy |
title_short |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_full |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_fullStr |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_sort |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Cardona Arias, Jaiberth Antonio López-Carvajal L. Tamayo Plata M.P. Vélez I.D. |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Cardona Arias, Jaiberth Antonio López-Carvajal L. Tamayo Plata M.P. Vélez I.D. |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Antimony sodium gluconate Colombia cost-effectiveness analysis cutaneous leishmaniasis thermotherapy |
topic |
Antimony sodium gluconate Colombia cost-effectiveness analysis cutaneous leishmaniasis thermotherapy |
description |
Objective: The treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis is toxic, has contraindications, and a high cost. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Methods: Effectiveness was the proportion of healing and safety with the adverse effects; these parameters were estimated from a controlled clinical trial and a meta-analysis. A standard costing was conducted. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. The uncertainty regarding effectiveness, safety, and costs was determined through sensitivity analyses. Results: The total costs were $66,807 with Glucantime and $14,079 with thermotherapy. The therapeutic effectiveness rates were 64.2% for thermotherapy and 85.1% for Glucantime. The average cost-effectiveness ratios ranged between $721 and $1275 for Glucantime and between $187 and $390 for thermotherapy. Based on the meta-analysis, thermotherapy may be a dominant strategy. Conclusion: The excellent cost-effectiveness ratio of thermotherapy shows the relevance of its inclusion in guidelines for the treatment. © 2017 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-16T22:15:46Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-16T22:15:46Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.15665/re.v14il1.675 |
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
17565383 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41760 |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cardona JA,López L,Tamayo MP,Vélez ID. Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Evid.-Based Med. 2017. 10. (2):p. 81-90. . |
url |
https://doi.org/10.15665/re.v14il1.675 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41760 |
identifier_str_mv |
17565383 Cardona JA,López L,Tamayo MP,Vélez ID. Cost-effectiveness analysis of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Evid.-Based Med. 2017. 10. (2):p. 81-90. . |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Evidence-Based Medicine |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb |
eu_rights_str_mv |
closedAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb |
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
90-81 |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Blackwell Publishing |
institution |
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
_version_ |
1814247340632965120 |