Productivity, demand and the home market effect

The nature of causality between international trade and industrialization remains ambiguous. We consider a model of international trade that features the home market effect—where there are differences in income and productivity between sectors and between countries—to identify additional channels by...

Full description

Autores:
Giraldo Salazar, Iader
Jaramillo, Fernando
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración
Repositorio:
Repositorio CESA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.cesa.edu.co:10726/5094
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10726/5094
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-018-9476-1
Palabra clave:
International trade
Non-homothetic preferences
Home market effect
Monopolistic competition
Rights
License
Acceso Restringido
id CESA2_e52d878db1e3f8070fb0c26055ea740a
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.cesa.edu.co:10726/5094
network_acronym_str CESA2
network_name_str Repositorio CESA
repository_id_str
spelling Giraldo Salazar, Iader472a9614-14f9-4084-b202-fcb367279fdf600Jaramillo, Fernandoc4c320ca-4576-43fc-8010-bb7bb318fdf3600Giraldo Salazar, Iader [0000-0003-3068-6384]Jaramillo, Fernando [0000-0001-5978-9884]Giraldo Salazar, Iader [57200334862]Jaramillo, Fernando [7004050228]2023-06-21T22:23:06Z2023-06-21T22:23:06Z2018-01-240923-7992http://hdl.handle.net/10726/5094instname:Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración – CESAreponame:Biblioteca Digital – CESArepourl:https://repository.cesa.edu.co/1573-708Xhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-018-9476-1engSpringer New York LLCProductivity, demand and the home market effectarticlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_71e4c1898caa6e32Acceso Restringidohttp://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/access_rights/c_16ec/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecThe nature of causality between international trade and industrialization remains ambiguous. We consider a model of international trade that features the home market effect—where there are differences in income and productivity between sectors and between countries—to identify additional channels by which to determine the effects of international trade on industrialization. The introduction of non-homothetic preferences and differences in productivity can aid in interpreting of some apparent paradoxes within international trade, such as the commercial relations between more populated countries as China and India and large economies in term of their GDP as the U.S. Population size, demand composition, and productivity levels constitute the three main channels by which to determine the effects of international trade. Interactions among these channels define the results obtained, especially in terms of the countries’ industrialization levels. Additionally, we find that welfare levels under trade are always higher than those under autarky.https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3068-6384https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-9884https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57200334862https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7004050228293517545Open Economies ReviewInternational tradeNon-homothetic preferencesHome market effectMonopolistic competition10726/5094oai:repository.cesa.edu.co:10726/50942023-10-02 18:58:10.414metadata only accessBiblioteca Digital - CESAbiblioteca@cesa.edu.co
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Productivity, demand and the home market effect
title Productivity, demand and the home market effect
spellingShingle Productivity, demand and the home market effect
International trade
Non-homothetic preferences
Home market effect
Monopolistic competition
title_short Productivity, demand and the home market effect
title_full Productivity, demand and the home market effect
title_fullStr Productivity, demand and the home market effect
title_full_unstemmed Productivity, demand and the home market effect
title_sort Productivity, demand and the home market effect
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Giraldo Salazar, Iader
Jaramillo, Fernando
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Giraldo Salazar, Iader
Jaramillo, Fernando
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv Giraldo Salazar, Iader [0000-0003-3068-6384]
Jaramillo, Fernando [0000-0001-5978-9884]
dc.contributor.scopus.none.fl_str_mv Giraldo Salazar, Iader [57200334862]
Jaramillo, Fernando [7004050228]
dc.subject.proposal.none.fl_str_mv International trade
Non-homothetic preferences
Home market effect
Monopolistic competition
topic International trade
Non-homothetic preferences
Home market effect
Monopolistic competition
description The nature of causality between international trade and industrialization remains ambiguous. We consider a model of international trade that features the home market effect—where there are differences in income and productivity between sectors and between countries—to identify additional channels by which to determine the effects of international trade on industrialization. The introduction of non-homothetic preferences and differences in productivity can aid in interpreting of some apparent paradoxes within international trade, such as the commercial relations between more populated countries as China and India and large economies in term of their GDP as the U.S. Population size, demand composition, and productivity levels constitute the three main channels by which to determine the effects of international trade. Interactions among these channels define the results obtained, especially in terms of the countries’ industrialization levels. Additionally, we find that welfare levels under trade are always higher than those under autarky.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-24
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-21T22:23:06Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-21T22:23:06Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_71e4c1898caa6e32
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0923-7992
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10726/5094
dc.identifier.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración – CESA
dc.identifier.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital – CESA
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repository.cesa.edu.co/
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1573-708X
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-018-9476-1
identifier_str_mv 0923-7992
instname:Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración – CESA
reponame:Biblioteca Digital – CESA
repourl:https://repository.cesa.edu.co/
1573-708X
url http://hdl.handle.net/10726/5094
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-018-9476-1
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationvolume.none.fl_str_mv 29
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 3
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 517
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 545
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.none.fl_str_mv Open Economies Review
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.local.none.fl_str_mv Acceso Restringido
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/access_rights/c_16ec/
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso Restringido
http://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/access_rights/c_16ec/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer New York LLC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer New York LLC
institution Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital - CESA
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca@cesa.edu.co
_version_ 1793339958328557568