Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results

This article is the continuation of a series of studies on the impact of the measures implemented by the Portuguese Ministry of Justice. This research addresses the results obtained in the civil enforcement actions arising from objectives included in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed betw...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Corporación Universitaria Americana

Repositorio:: Repositorio Corporación Universitaria Americana

Idioma:: eng

id	Americana2_3ccff57e45ab59fe76e968ad66ee77ec
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.americana.edu.co:001/317
network_acronym_str	Americana2
network_name_str	Repositorio Corporación Universitaria Americana
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results El Experimento del Ministro de la Justicia de Portugal con la Troika: Disipación de dudas sobre el suceso, continuación y confirmación de los resultados positivos O Experimento do Ministro da Justiça Portuguesa com a Troika: Dissipação de dúvidas sobre o sucesso, continuação e confirmação dos resultados positivos
title	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results
spellingShingle	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results Troika Memorandum of Understanding Portuguese Ministry of Justice Civil Enforcement Actions Evaluation of Public Policies
title_short	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results
title_full	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results
title_fullStr	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results
title_full_unstemmed	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results
title_sort	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv	Sello editorial Coruniamericana
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Troika Memorandum of Understanding Portuguese Ministry of Justice Civil Enforcement Actions Evaluation of Public Policies
topic	Troika Memorandum of Understanding Portuguese Ministry of Justice Civil Enforcement Actions Evaluation of Public Policies
description	This article is the continuation of a series of studies on the impact of the measures implemented by the Portuguese Ministry of Justice. This research addresses the results obtained in the civil enforcement actions arising from objectives included in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between Portugal and the so-called Troika (International Monetary Fund / European Commission / European Central Bank). The empirical study was extended to cover the quantitative analysis of the results achieved not only during the Troika period but also during the post-Troika period. The results show and confirm a continued positive effect on the level of civil enforcement actions in the period analyzed.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-20 2022-10-11T14:51:26Z 2022-10-11T14:51:26Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	Alves Ribeiro Correia, P. M. ., Videira, S. A. ., & de Oliveira Mendes, I. . (2019). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results. Pensamiento Americano, 12(24), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309 https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309 2745-1402 Corporación Universitaria Américana 2027-2448 RIA - Repositorio Institucional Américana https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/ https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/317
identifier_str_mv	Alves Ribeiro Correia, P. M. ., Videira, S. A. ., & de Oliveira Mendes, I. . (2019). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results. Pensamiento Americano, 12(24), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309 2745-1402 Corporación Universitaria Américana 2027-2448 RIA - Repositorio Institucional Américana
url	https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309 https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/ https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/317
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	53 24 40 12 Pensamiento Americano Ambach, P., & Rackwitz, K. (2013). A Model of International Judicial Administration? The Evolution of Managerial Practices at the International Criminal Court. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76 (3-4), 119-161. Retrieved from: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4373&context=lcp Barnard, C. (1971). The Functions of the Executive: 30th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bell, J. (2006). Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Campbell, D. (2013). The Sky is Falling (Again): Evaluating the Current Crisis in the Judiciary. New England Law Review, 47, 571-603. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2515994 Catarino, J., & Correia, P. (2016). Receitas Fiscais e Tributação Geral sobre o Consumo em Portugal: Um Estudo sobre Eventuais Assimetrias do Comporta- mento dos Sujeitos Passivos do Imposto no Final da Primeira Década do Século XXI. Revista da FAE, 19 (1), 6-17. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315772893_Receitas_Fiscais_e_Tributacao_Geral_sobre_o_Consumo_em_Portugal_Um_Estudo_sobre_Eventuais_Assimetrias_do_Comportamento_dos_Sujeitos_Passivos_do_Imposto_no_Final_da_Primeira_Decada_do_Seculo_XX Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2016). European Judicial Systems – Edition 2016 (2014 data): Efficiency and Quality of Justice. Retrieved from Conselho da Europa: https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/evaluation/2016/publication/REV1/2016_1%20%20CEPEJ%20Study%2023%20 Correia, P. M., & Catarino, J. (2016). Ingreso Bruto Tributable del IVA: Evidencia de Diferenciación de los Municipios de la Costa Portuguesa. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 64, 225-246. Retrieved from: http://old.clad.org/portal/publicaciones-del-clad/revistacladreformademocracia/articulos/064febrero2016/grossrevenuefor-vat-tax-evidence-of-differentiation-at-the-portuguese-littoral-municipalities Correia, P. M., & Jesus, I. (2016). Combate às Transferências Bancárias Ilegítimas pela Internet no Direito Português: Entre as Experiências Domésticas e Políticas Globais Concertadas. Revista Direito GV, 12 (2), 542-563. doi: 10.1590/2317-6172201622 Correia, P. M., & Videira, S. (2016). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment, Part II: Continued Positive Results for Civil Enforcement Actions in Troika's Aftermath. International Journal for Court Administration, 8 (1), 20-31. doi: 10.18352/ijca.215 Correia, P. M., Pinto, R., Garcia, B., & Dias, M. (2015). Teoria Institucional e o Poder dos Dirigentes dos Hospitais em Portugal, Parte III: Comparação com Outros Setores de Atividade. Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde, 7(3), 135-141. Retrieved f rom: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309410556_Teoria_Institucional_e_o_Poder_dos_Dirigentes_dos_Hospitais_em_Potugal_Parte_III_Comparacao_com_Outros_Setores_de_Atividade Correia, P. M., & Dias, M. T. (2018). O poder detido pelos dirigentes máximos das organizações: evidências estatísticas de homogeneidade ao nível das perceções, em função da idade e antiguidade dos trabalhadores, em Portugal. Pensamiento Americano, 11(20), 80-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21803%2Fpenamer.11.20.497 Direção-Geral da Política de Justiça. (2016). Estatísticas da Justiça – Alguns Indicadores Estatísticos Sobre os Processos nos Tribunais Judiciais de 1a Instância, 2007-2015. Retrieved f rom Ministério da Justiça, Portugal: http://www.dgpj.mj.pt/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/algunsindicadores_2/downloadFile/file/Resultados%20 2015_20161028.pdf?nocache=1477659998.74 Frederickson, H., Smith, K., Larimer, C., & Licari, M. (2012). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. Gomes, C. (2007). The Transformation of the Portuguese Judicial Organization: Between Efficiency and Democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 3 (1), 101-111. Retrieved from: https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.39/ Guimarães, T., Correia, P., Bilhim, J., & Akutsu, L. (2015). Governança em Tribunais de Justiça de Portugal: Adaptação e Validação de Escala de Medida. Ciências e Políticas Públicas, 1 (1): 25-46. Retrieved from: http://capp.iscsp.ulisboa.pt/images/Ejournal/ Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results CPP%20Journal%20CAPP%20v1%20n1.pdf Hayek, F. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume I: Rules and Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F. (1978). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume II: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing Public Policy. London: Sage. Kruskal, W., & Wallis, W. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 (260), 583-621. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441. Lane, J. (2000). New Public Management. London: Routledge. Langbroek, P. (2008). Entre Responsabilisation et Indépendance des Magistrats: La Réorganisation du Système Judiciaire des Pays-Bas. Revue Française D’administration Publique, 125, 67-79. doi: 10.3917/rfap.125.0067 Madureira, C. (2015). A reforma da Administração Pública Central no Portugal democrático: do período pórevolucionário à intervenção da troika. Revis- ta de Administração Pública, 49(3), 547-562. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612129503 Portugal. (2011). Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu_borrower/mou/2011-05-18-mou-portugal_en.pdf Rocha, F. & Stoleroff, A. (2014). The challenges of the crisis and the external intervention in Portugal. In Fundación 1o de Mayo (Ed.), The New EU Economic Stephenson, M. (2004). Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20 (2), 379-399. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewh038 Walsh, B. (2008). Judicial Productivity in India. International Journal for Court Administration, 1 (1), 23-30. doi: 10.18352/ijca.123
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	13 p. application/pdf application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Pensamiento Americano Barranquilla, Colombia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Pensamiento Americano Barranquilla, Colombia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/309
institution	Corporación Universitaria Americana
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1811560146748309504
spelling	Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive ResultsEl Experimento del Ministro de la Justicia de Portugal con la Troika: Disipación de dudas sobre el suceso, continuación y confirmación de los resultados positivosO Experimento do Ministro da Justiça Portuguesa com a Troika: Dissipação de dúvidas sobre o sucesso, continuação e confirmação dos resultados positivosTroikaMemorandum of UnderstandingPortuguese Ministry of JusticeCivil Enforcement ActionsEvaluation of Public PoliciesThis article is the continuation of a series of studies on the impact of the measures implemented by the Portuguese Ministry of Justice. This research addresses the results obtained in the civil enforcement actions arising from objectives included in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between Portugal and the so-called Troika (International Monetary Fund / European Commission / European Central Bank). The empirical study was extended to cover the quantitative analysis of the results achieved not only during the Troika period but also during the post-Troika period. The results show and confirm a continued positive effect on the level of civil enforcement actions in the period analyzed.Este arti?culo es la continuidad de una serie de estudios sobre el impacto de las medidas implementadas por el Ministro de la Justicia Portuguesa. Esta investigacio?n se acerca a los resultados obtenidos en las medidas de ejecucio?n que salieron a la luz de los objetivos incluidos en el Memora?ndum de Entendimiento (MoU) firmado entre Portugal y la llamada Troika (Fondo Monetario Internacional/Comisio?n Europea/Banco Central Europeo). El estudio empi?rico fue ampliado para cubrir los ana?lisis cuantitativos de los resultados obtenidos no solamente durante la Troika, pero en el periodo post-Troika. Los resultados confirman la continuacio?n del efecto positivo en el nivel de las acciones de las medidas de ejecucio?n en el periodo analizado.Pensamiento AmericanoBarranquilla, ColombiaSello editorial CoruniamericanaAlves Ribeiro Correia, Pedro MiguelAntas Videira, SusanaDe Oliveira Mendes, Ireneu2022-10-11T14:51:26Z2022-10-11T14:51:26Z2019-07-20Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb113 p.application/pdfapplication/pdfAlves Ribeiro Correia, P. M. ., Videira, S. A. ., & de Oliveira Mendes, I. . (2019). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results. Pensamiento Americano, 12(24), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.3092745-1402Corporación Universitaria Américana2027-2448RIA - Repositorio Institucional Américanahttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/317https://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/309eng53244012Pensamiento AmericanoAmbach, P., & Rackwitz, K. (2013). A Model of International Judicial Administration? The Evolution of Managerial Practices at the International Criminal Court. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76 (3-4), 119-161. Retrieved from: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4373&context=lcpBarnard, C. (1971). The Functions of the Executive: 30th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Bell, J. (2006). Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Campbell, D. (2013). The Sky is Falling (Again): Evaluating the Current Crisis in the Judiciary. New England Law Review, 47, 571-603. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2515994Catarino, J., & Correia, P. (2016). Receitas Fiscais e Tributação Geral sobre o Consumo em Portugal: Um Estudo sobre Eventuais Assimetrias do Comporta- mento dos Sujeitos Passivos do Imposto no Final da Primeira Década do Século XXI. Revista da FAE, 19 (1), 6-17. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315772893_Receitas_Fiscais_e_Tributacao_Geral_sobre_o_Consumo_em_Portugal_Um_Estudo_sobre_Eventuais_Assimetrias_do_Comportamento_dos_Sujeitos_Passivos_do_Imposto_no_Final_da_Primeira_Decada_do_Seculo_XXCommission for the Efficiency of Justice (2016). European Judicial Systems – Edition 2016 (2014 data): Efficiency and Quality of Justice. Retrieved from Conselho da Europa: https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/evaluation/2016/publication/REV1/2016_1%20%20CEPEJ%20Study%2023%20Correia, P. M., & Catarino, J. (2016). Ingreso Bruto Tributable del IVA: Evidencia de Diferenciación de los Municipios de la Costa Portuguesa. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 64, 225-246. Retrieved from: http://old.clad.org/portal/publicaciones-del-clad/revistacladreformademocracia/articulos/064febrero2016/grossrevenuefor-vat-tax-evidence-of-differentiation-at-the-portuguese-littoral-municipalitiesCorreia, P. M., & Jesus, I. (2016). Combate às Transferências Bancárias Ilegítimas pela Internet no Direito Português: Entre as Experiências Domésticas e Políticas Globais Concertadas. Revista Direito GV, 12 (2), 542-563. doi: 10.1590/2317-6172201622Correia, P. M., & Videira, S. (2016). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment, Part II: Continued Positive Results for Civil Enforcement Actions in Troika's Aftermath. International Journal for Court Administration, 8 (1), 20-31. doi: 10.18352/ijca.215Correia, P. M., Pinto, R., Garcia, B., & Dias, M. (2015). Teoria Institucional e o Poder dos Dirigentes dos Hospitais em Portugal, Parte III: Comparação com Outros Setores de Atividade. Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde, 7(3), 135-141. Retrieved f rom: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309410556_Teoria_Institucional_e_o_Poder_dos_Dirigentes_dos_Hospitais_em_Potugal_Parte_III_Comparacao_com_Outros_Setores_de_AtividadeCorreia, P. M., & Dias, M. T. (2018). O poder detido pelos dirigentes máximos das organizações: evidências estatísticas de homogeneidade ao nível das perceções, em função da idade e antiguidade dos trabalhadores, em Portugal. Pensamiento Americano, 11(20), 80-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21803%2Fpenamer.11.20.497Direção-Geral da Política de Justiça. (2016). Estatísticas da Justiça – Alguns Indicadores Estatísticos Sobre os Processos nos Tribunais Judiciais de 1a Instância, 2007-2015. Retrieved f rom Ministério da Justiça, Portugal: http://www.dgpj.mj.pt/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/algunsindicadores_2/downloadFile/file/Resultados%20 2015_20161028.pdf?nocache=1477659998.74Frederickson, H., Smith, K., Larimer, C., & Licari, M. (2012). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Gomes, C. (2007). The Transformation of the Portuguese Judicial Organization: Between Efficiency and Democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 3 (1), 101-111. Retrieved from: https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.39/Guimarães, T., Correia, P., Bilhim, J., & Akutsu, L. (2015). Governança em Tribunais de Justiça de Portugal: Adaptação e Validação de Escala de Medida. Ciências e Políticas Públicas, 1 (1): 25-46. Retrieved from: http://capp.iscsp.ulisboa.pt/images/Ejournal/Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results CPP%20Journal%20CAPP%20v1%20n1.pdfHayek, F. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume I: Rules and Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Hayek, F. (1978). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume II: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing Public Policy. London: Sage.Kruskal, W., & Wallis, W. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 (260), 583-621. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.Lane, J. (2000). New Public Management. London: Routledge.Langbroek, P. (2008). Entre Responsabilisation et Indépendance des Magistrats: La Réorganisation du Système Judiciaire des Pays-Bas. Revue Française D’administration Publique, 125, 67-79. doi: 10.3917/rfap.125.0067Madureira, C. (2015). A reforma da Administração Pública Central no Portugal democrático: do período pórevolucionário à intervenção da troika. Revis- ta de Administração Pública, 49(3), 547-562. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612129503Portugal. (2011). Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu_borrower/mou/2011-05-18-mou-portugal_en.pdfRocha, F. & Stoleroff, A. (2014). The challenges of the crisis and the external intervention in Portugal. In Fundación 1o de Mayo (Ed.), The New EU EconomicStephenson, M. (2004). Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20 (2), 379-399. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewh038Walsh, B. (2008). Judicial Productivity in India. International Journal for Court Administration, 1 (1), 23-30. doi: 10.18352/ijca.123info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/oai:repositorio.americana.edu.co:001/3172023-03-08T15:06:31Z

Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results

Publicaciones similares