Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional
An experiment was conducted to test a variety of corn storage systems. In conducting the study three types of deposits were used: A) Silo: a cylindrical container constructed with metal screen which bottom was placed 50 centimeters above ground surface. A metal protection was provided around each co...
- Autores:
-
Monroy V., Jaime F.
Ospina M., Julio E.
Romero C., Gabriel
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 1978
- Institución:
- Agrosavia
- Repositorio:
- Agrosavia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.agrosavia.co:20.500.12324/35479
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/35479
- Palabra clave:
- Manipulación, transporte, almacenamiento y protección de productos de origen vegetal - J11
Maíz
Almacenamiento
Cosecha
Germinación
Transitorios
- Rights
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
id |
Agrosavia2_9aa6ea569e6ed60ffa214892276424bb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.agrosavia.co:20.500.12324/35479 |
network_acronym_str |
Agrosavia2 |
network_name_str |
Agrosavia |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional |
title |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional |
spellingShingle |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional Manipulación, transporte, almacenamiento y protección de productos de origen vegetal - J11 Maíz Almacenamiento Cosecha Germinación Transitorios |
title_short |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional |
title_full |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional |
title_fullStr |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional |
title_sort |
Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicional |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Monroy V., Jaime F. Ospina M., Julio E. Romero C., Gabriel |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Monroy V., Jaime F. Ospina M., Julio E. Romero C., Gabriel |
dc.subject.fao.spa.fl_str_mv |
Manipulación, transporte, almacenamiento y protección de productos de origen vegetal - J11 |
topic |
Manipulación, transporte, almacenamiento y protección de productos de origen vegetal - J11 Maíz Almacenamiento Cosecha Germinación Transitorios |
dc.subject.agrovoc.spa.fl_str_mv |
Maíz Almacenamiento Cosecha Germinación |
dc.subject.red.spa.fl_str_mv |
Transitorios |
description |
An experiment was conducted to test a variety of corn storage systems. In conducting the study three types of deposits were used: A) Silo: a cylindrical container constructed with metal screen which bottom was placed 50 centimeters above ground surface. A metal protection was provided around each column to avoid rodents entrance - B) Granary: a container made out of bomboo and placed on a wood structure 50 centimeters above ground surface. As in system A), the same kind of protection was provided against rodents. C) Conventional: the local farmer has been utilizing a room for grain storage purposes, so comparisons with this traditional method were made. Corn was stored in various ways as follows: 220 kilograms of shelled corn (S), for the silo; 275 kilograms of cobs with husks (TCC), for one of the two granaries tested; 350 kilograms of cobs without husks for the other; 800 kilograms of cobs with husks (T), for the conventional system. Before storing the corn, all deposits, except the conventional one, were properly cleaned and sprinkled with an insecticide to provide the same initial conditions from an environmental point of view. The corn to be stored was sprinkled in like manner, keeping it from getting too wet. In order to determine changes in the state of conservation with time of storage, corn samples were taken every week. The following could be observed in system T: a. The highest temperature troughout the experiment. b. Spoiled corn and a decrease in the germination percentage. c. Damage by rodents in amount which was not possible to determine. System S showed the best storage conditions as well as least percentage of losses far as spoiled grains and decrease in germination percentage in concern. None of the treatments showed growth of microorganisms. |
publishDate |
1978 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
1978 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-21T05:24:31Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-21T05:24:31Z |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.localeng.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo científico |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0018-8794 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/35479 |
dc.identifier.aleph.spa.fl_str_mv |
2495 |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia |
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repository.agrosavia.co |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA |
identifier_str_mv |
0018-8794 2495 reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia repourl:https://repository.agrosavia.co instname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/35479 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista ICA |
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso a texto completo |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Acceso a texto completo http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.country.spa.fl_str_mv |
Colombia |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario |
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá (Colombia) |
institution |
Agrosavia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/1/2495%20%281%29.pdf https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/2/license_rdf https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/3/license.txt https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/4/2495%20%281%29.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d10a8e1633995c4c38852b765394f95f 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 8dc28136451ac5d43494d02a9a885cdd |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agrosavia - Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bac@agrosavia.co |
_version_ |
1814380402595332096 |
spelling |
Monroy V., Jaime F.0c64317a-d1a5-4eda-9aba-81f517aa19f0-1Ospina M., Julio E.626e81ef-67c7-4d47-a25e-9ee9c4db132b-1Romero C., Gabrielb011cbd4-02cf-4c99-bfd1-58143c8be10f-12019-09-21T05:24:31Z2019-09-21T05:24:31Z19780018-8794http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/354792495reponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombiarepourl:https://repository.agrosavia.coinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIAAn experiment was conducted to test a variety of corn storage systems. In conducting the study three types of deposits were used: A) Silo: a cylindrical container constructed with metal screen which bottom was placed 50 centimeters above ground surface. A metal protection was provided around each column to avoid rodents entrance - B) Granary: a container made out of bomboo and placed on a wood structure 50 centimeters above ground surface. As in system A), the same kind of protection was provided against rodents. C) Conventional: the local farmer has been utilizing a room for grain storage purposes, so comparisons with this traditional method were made. Corn was stored in various ways as follows: 220 kilograms of shelled corn (S), for the silo; 275 kilograms of cobs with husks (TCC), for one of the two granaries tested; 350 kilograms of cobs without husks for the other; 800 kilograms of cobs with husks (T), for the conventional system. Before storing the corn, all deposits, except the conventional one, were properly cleaned and sprinkled with an insecticide to provide the same initial conditions from an environmental point of view. The corn to be stored was sprinkled in like manner, keeping it from getting too wet. In order to determine changes in the state of conservation with time of storage, corn samples were taken every week. The following could be observed in system T: a. The highest temperature troughout the experiment. b. Spoiled corn and a decrease in the germination percentage. c. Damage by rodents in amount which was not possible to determine. System S showed the best storage conditions as well as least percentage of losses far as spoiled grains and decrease in germination percentage in concern. None of the treatments showed growth of microorganisms.Se llevó a cabo un ensayo para probar diferentes sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz. Se utilizaron 3 tipos de depósitos denominados así: A) Silo: recipiente cilíndrico, construido en malla metálica, cuyo fondo quedo a 50 cm del suelo. Para evitar la entrada de roedores, en cada columna se colocó un protector metálico. B) Troje:: recipiente de guadua colocado sobre una estructura de madera. El fondo del recipiente quedo a 50 cm del suelo. Como en el sistema A) se utilizó la misma clase de protección contra los roedores. C) Tradicional: Consistió en una de las formas como normalmente el agricultor almacena su cosecha, en este caso una pieza servía para tal fin. Este sistema sirvió como punto de comparación con los demás sistemas. En el silo se almacenaron 220 kg de maíz desgranado (S). En una troje se almacenaron 275 kg de maíz en mazorcas con capacho (TCC) y en la otra se almacenaron 350 kg de maíz en mazorca sin capacho (TSC). En la pieza se almacenaron 800 kg de maíz en mazorca con capacho (T). Antes de almacenar el maíz, los depósitos mencionados a excepción del tradicional, fueron aseados y asperjados con un insecticida para evitar infestaciones iniciales y colocar a todos en igualdad de condiciones en lo referente a este aspecto. Luego se asperjó el maíz (almacenado) con el mismo insecticida, evitando humedecerlo. Cada 8 días se tomaron muestras para analizar el estado en que se encontraba el producto y así Ilevar el control. El sistema T, presentó a través del ensayo la mayor temperatura, daño y disminución del porcentaje de germinación. No se presentó desarrollo de microorganismos en ninguno de los tratamientos. El ataque de roedores se presentó solamente en 1, pero el daño no se pudo cuantificar. El sistema S, presento las mejores condiciones de almacenamiento ya que el porcentaje de grano dañado y disminución del porcentaje de germinación fueron los más bajos.Maíz-Zea maysapplication/pdf-1spaInstituto Colombiano AgropecuarioBogotá (Colombia)Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceso a texto completohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Comportamiento de tres sistemas de almacenamiento de maíz (Zea mays L.) comparado con un sistema tradicionalManipulación, transporte, almacenamiento y protección de productos de origen vegetal - J11MaízAlmacenamientoCosechaGerminaciónTransitoriosInvestigadorProfesionalCientíficoarticleArtículo científicohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85-1Revista ICAColombiaORIGINAL2495 (1).pdf2495 (1).pdfapplication/pdf2371122https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/1/2495%20%281%29.pdfd10a8e1633995c4c38852b765394f95fMD51open accessCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53open accessTHUMBNAIL2495 (1).pdf.jpg2495 (1).pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9282https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/20.500.12324/35479/4/2495%20%281%29.pdf.jpg8dc28136451ac5d43494d02a9a885cddMD54open access20.500.12324/35479oai:repository.agrosavia.co:20.500.12324/354792022-04-07 14:01:23.482open accessAgrosavia - Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuariabac@agrosavia.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 |